2024 VW Golf 8 Variant 1.5 TSI Facelift Manual (116 PS) TEST DRIVE
Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары
2024 VW Golf 8 Variant 1.5 TSI Manual
85 kW / 114 HP / 116 PS
1.5L Turbo Petrol Gasoline Engine
1498 cm3 / 91.4 CUI
4-Cylinder
220 Nm / 162 ft-lb
6-Speed Manual
1369 kg / 3018 lbs
TEST DRIVE
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Light Night Design
Fuel Consumption from 80 to 200 kmh (50 to 124 mph)
Acceleration 0-170 kmh
Пікірлер: 43
It has fuel consumption as if it were a diesel and great acceleration. Volkswangen knows its work.
@Mr11ESSE111
21 күн бұрын
if they dont lie on fuel computer
@kaancaglar7076
16 күн бұрын
Diesel is better
@Mr11ESSE111
16 күн бұрын
@@kaancaglar7076 yes and no!!depend on mileage and how much it car costs
For a 116 hp engine almost unbelievable acceleration and top speed figures and basically identical to the previous 130 hp version. Great consumption too thanks to the very long gearing.
@Mr11ESSE111
21 күн бұрын
probably it is 130hp but on paper they set on 116 because of taxes in some countries
Biggest suprise of 2024 so far consumption and performance
excellent engine for consumption and performance
@MatteoGnn
24 күн бұрын
For sure. I have the same 1.5 TSI with 130hp and the performance is exactly the same. I’m sure the dyno would show around 130 hp instead of 115
I‘m happy that VW doesn’t Downsize the engines that much… 116 PS compared to 1.5L is very good👍 Like the 1.6 FSI 115 PS
@Mr11ESSE111
21 күн бұрын
they have that 1.0tsi with 110-115hp but thast one are much worse in everything
I don't like this generation of Golf and prefer the seats of the Seat Leon, but this engine's efficiency makes this a car you cannot avoid considering in this class. Amazing if you drive a lot of highway kilometers with speeds between 100-130!
Could you mesure the time from 80 to 120 km/h? It would be very useful for most of us. Thank you.
No one seems to mention the front grill which has way to much "visible" space, you can see the radiator which looks ugly. Also front assist is put from the logo down in that area.
GOOD 🙂🙂
80 km 2.9L excellent value, and then if not variant maybe 2.7L
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
21 күн бұрын
And if sedan like jetta it will better than hat. Sedan has always better aerodynamic as hatch
what is that color ?
Wie kann es sein, dass es mit 160 U/min im 6. Gang geht? Bei einem 1,5-Liter-Motor mit 150 PS scheint das unmöglich zu sein.
1:03 poor glasses! The engine must be more powerfull than they declare or the speedometer is very optimistic.
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
21 күн бұрын
Lol the glasses are old, will order soon new glasses 😅
This is a 140-150 hp performance, considerig the weight of the car, too. Are you sure it's really the 116 hp version?
@Mr11ESSE111
21 күн бұрын
its downgraded only by electronic and maybe exchaust ,and similar!1 on dyno it probably have around 130
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
21 күн бұрын
It was 100% 116 ps, on car regristration paper was written 85 kw and 1498 cm3
@emanuelefossati3812
21 күн бұрын
@@TESTDRIVEFREAK interesting engine configuration, considering the real performace
Decent daily.
If you drive most time in the city do you know the consumption??
@TESTDRIVEFREAK
15 күн бұрын
Go to in our channel, there is already city drive with fuel consumption
@kvaf79
15 күн бұрын
thanks !!
Why does it sound like a diesel?
👍👍👍👍👍 👍👍👍👍👍 👍👍👍👍👍 👍👍👍👍👍
10,8 with 200kmh ,its only few diesels have that or something less
The MK7 had way better interior quality compared to this and better design without this tablet-screen. But I really like the engine, nice consumption and good performance for daily driving.
@tomshld
9 күн бұрын
Not really. Mk7 looks very old inside and the plastic feels cheap.
sembra abbia almeno 130cv
the 1.5 TSI is really an air pump, I would recommend the 2 liter TDI
@Kalvarija
24 күн бұрын
I was speaking with mechanic in Skoda dealer. He told me that they get more cars with 2.0TDI than TSI which has problems. Due to TDI are very overloaded with all this “eco” shit like AdBlue system etc.
@MFSE7EN
24 күн бұрын
But you've seen the acceleration? Even with the 116HP version, 0-100 9s. Not an airpump at all in my opinion. And it has a timing belt, so way less headache with timing chains.
@jt7891
24 күн бұрын
@@MFSE7EN Replacement in every 4 years is expensive....
@MFSE7EN
24 күн бұрын
@@jt7891 if you drive 240.000km in 4 years..😂😂😂
@supermutant01
24 күн бұрын
@@jt7891 Volkswagen timing chains are shit.
My God, what an awful -looking car.