2015 Renault Kadjar Crash Tests

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

The passenger compartment of the Renault Kadjar remained stable in the frontal offset test. The driver dummy scores maximum points, with good protection of all body critical regions and the passenger dummy lost only a fraction of a point, with adequate chest protection. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal test, the driver dummy again scored maximum points. The rear passenger dummy had a marginal level of chest protection but all other critical body areas were well protected. The Kadjar provided good protection to all body regions in the side impact barrier test, simulating another car striking the side of the vehicle, and also in the more sever side pole test. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision, while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is available but it is not standard equipment so its low-speed whiplash protection was not assessed.
The Kadjar scored maximum points for its protection of the 11⁄2 year dummy in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. Protection of the 3 year dummy was also good apart from marginally high tensile forces in the neck. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. Cars before VIN VF1RFE00X53586729 have a very slightly different rear seat cushion and position of the seatbelt buckles.
The bumper provided good protection for pedestrians’ legs and scored maximum points. Protection of the pelvis was at least adequate in all areas tested. The bonnet provided head protection that was predominantly adequate, with good protection towards the centre of the bonnet surface and poor results only at the stiff windscreen pillars.
If you love cars, you should subscribe now to official YouCar's channel: urlz.fr/lEd
Go! It's free!
All the Best.

Пікірлер: 27

  • @tomb2286
    @tomb22863 жыл бұрын

    Very fitting music

  • @trinhminhtrang7359
    @trinhminhtrang73593 жыл бұрын

    Pourquoi il y a pas de tests à 130 km/h pour les autoroutes .

  • @mariusstancu4000
    @mariusstancu40005 жыл бұрын

    Real tests are at 100-120 km h...not 60

  • @SuperGeronimo999

    @SuperGeronimo999

    4 жыл бұрын

    Shit car... lost a comrade in it. He crashed frontally (with a Kadjar, a SUV) into a Mercedes A class (compact car) swerving into his lane. He's dead. The woman in A class survived. I know many factors play a role, but i don't believe in those test results anymore.

  • @markmd9

    @markmd9

    4 жыл бұрын

    There is no car in which you can survive over 100km/h crash in a concrete wall

  • @markmd9

    @markmd9

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@SuperGeronimo999 kadjar is lighter than what it may look and A class is heavier than what you may think. They are approximately the same weight. So who dies and who lives went to smaller details, even not related to the cars. For example if the women had lighter than average weight and your friend heavier body weight then she could withstand higher G force than him.

  • @nm6105

    @nm6105

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@markmd9 i saw a Vw Polo(6c) which crashed frontally. I think into a big tree. It crashed with 125km/h and the driver survived, and he made the video. The car wasn't affected very much. The structure, the passenger compartement remained INTACT.

  • @LtuGamingVideos
    @LtuGamingVideos8 жыл бұрын

    like for music

  • @ShortCarloseLaurinha
    @ShortCarloseLaurinha4 жыл бұрын

    This level segurit never coming in Brazil 🇧🇷 😩

  • @SuperNiceguy60
    @SuperNiceguy608 жыл бұрын

    I bought one

  • @kastriotaliu8343

    @kastriotaliu8343

    8 жыл бұрын

    well,good luck with that.I hope after 2 years you won't sell it(electrical problems,sudden technical issues,oil leaking,reliability equals zero,and lots of other stuff that only french cars are able to surprise us).had a lot of renaults,I know what I'm talking(had 3 brand new ones).again,good luck with that m8 ;-)

  • @SuperNiceguy60

    @SuperNiceguy60

    8 жыл бұрын

    Kastriot Aliu Is the Second Time I m buying exactly the same engine , the engine I have is extremely reliable I ve done 60.000 miles on my previous one no issues i know what to expect I have a (4 years) warranty Renault in my opinion has a stunning customer service which will not try to blame you if anything goes wrong , I M COVERED !!!

  • @erikh1041

    @erikh1041

    7 жыл бұрын

    renault is almost the same brand as Nissan now. They make the same engines and nissan makes very good engines. Ive had one for the last 5 years with no issues.

  • @SuperGeronimo999

    @SuperGeronimo999

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@SuperNiceguy60 And, still happy with it? Drive carefully.

  • @niceboy60

    @niceboy60

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@SuperGeronimo999 Never Brokedown nor any faults in the last 4 years , there's a few ratles coming from the interior, but not a deal breaker

  • @TheSoldatov
    @TheSoldatov8 жыл бұрын

    i think he is very soft

  • @bulentkalmaz936

    @bulentkalmaz936

    3 жыл бұрын

    Ben think he is very soft

  • @doddsalfa

    @doddsalfa

    2 жыл бұрын

    Which equals safety

Келесі