I missed this lesson in class, but watching this video I feel as if I was there with them, amazing video, very well done.

Just what i needed at 3:30 a.m cramming for my chemistry exam thats in exactly 5 hours, mucho gracias

@DineshKumar-bw1jt

4 жыл бұрын

Muchas

I can see clearly now the pain is gone!

In a previous video you said your daughter's second name would be molality. So I guess we know what your daughter will be called! Lattice Molality Thornley!

the shade throwing at the beginning of this video is real...lol

I just LOOVE your explanation👏🏽

Thank you so much! I finally got this after struggling for a year or so! I have an exam coming up and this has definitely boosted my confidence!!

@ibchemvids

7 жыл бұрын

Glad I can help

Thank you for the explanation and the great chart! Professors here don't seem to explain every individual step as well as you do, I think we could really use you here in Florida! lol

Something I struggled for two months to learn was taught to me in literally ten minutes thank you so much.

@ibchemvids

2 жыл бұрын

These are my favorite comments and mostly why I make these vieos - thank you.

Quite useful...Thank you! The Mr Kelly part was hilarious. Just the way you said it.

Thank you, I was struggling, but I can go to my test after watching your video, Thank you again

Bloody great video mate. Huge help!!!!

love your sense of humor!

This is the only thing that helped me understand. Thank you so much!!!!

Great videos. Thank you so much!

Thank you so much your (sum of the clockwise - sum of the anticlockwise=0) has helped me a lot with the exams only next week I thought I would hate the born-haber calculation you just made it a lot easier :)

Right off the bat the illustration is helpful! How was I so confused

hahahaha "Lattice" killed me - thanks for the vid :)

this is so clear! thank you! :)

Lattice Molality Thornley

Literally amazing thank you so much

Thanks You are a truly enthusiastic IB Chem teacher:D

Ooo Myy Godd, This is SO UNDERRATED, thanks, now I understand, I was stuck at the ionisation and electron affinity part

Thank you so much for your videos they were really helpful in preparing for the exam! :D

Lol! The introduction was so perfect. I can't stop laughing.

Thank you this was very helpful!!!

fuckin love you man life saver for a missed class

That helped a lot. Thankyou so much 😁

I loved seeing your frustration hahaha but thank you for this!!!! I get it now! I just have to learn that Bond Energy part...

this really helped out thankyou, fine work :)

This is a fabulous video with which I can actually understand Born-Haber Cycles...You're the best! Thank you so much! Also quick question, how does enthalpy of solution fit into the cycle? I'm not quite sure with that bit

u the greatest!!! #shoutout all the way fr jamaica

@ronelpanchoo3969

5 жыл бұрын

Oof it's my turn to prepare for Cape😣😣

Thanks a bunch sir, HL Chem exam in a little over a week!! :D

Amazing video tks mate

yes, you are right we need to use first as well as second Ionization energies for Mg. Mg -------> Mg^+1 ----------> Mg^+2

Not the hero we deserve but the hero we need. Lord and Saviour Sir Richard Thornley!

Okay studied it a bit more and I understand it all!!! All thanks to you :]

so helpful!!! thank u sooooo much!

he makes chemistry sound so thick and sophisticated.....me likey

Thanks! Helped me a ton with my homework!

@ibchemvids

3 жыл бұрын

Glad i could help.

Coolest vdo on born haber cycle.. Lvdd ir

Thanks for your effort to make these videos. My lectures where sending me to sleep...

I searched online for the second ionisation energy for sodium because I remembered that it is much harder for Na to lose a second electron since Na+ is already a full octet, the 2nd IE energy of Na is actually 4563 kJ/mol, so the total IE energy of Na2+ should be 496+4563=5059, not 2*496.

Thank you so much 💕🙏

That's right, Mr. Kelly ...

Thank you sir!

YOU ARE AMAZING

Thank you so much!!

Could you write the deltaH of atomization of chlorine next to deltaH of atomization of sodium (so there would be two arrows, and you would have be atomizing chlorine sooner), just to conserve some space? Or are the markers quite particular with the arrangement?

Does it matter which order you do the left-handed ones in? For example, at 6:30, I did the two atomization steps first, then did the ionization, but you did atomization, ionization, atomization.

Thank you so much 💕

awesome,thank you very much

Amazing. thankyou

Kinda feels like captain J sparrow is teaching me chemistry... XD

Yes this is OK - some people even write the sodium parallel to the chlorine - just clearly label it

please be my chemistry teacher

@listerinekiller

6 жыл бұрын

Hey its Kanna-chan! UwU

@stephenmvura6626

6 жыл бұрын

me too

Wouldn't the lattice value be positive due to bond making which is delta H positive?

Wow my chem teacher is good but this really good as well

is it always 1/2X2 for the gas element on the reactant side?

Thank you for telling me that if we only use one atom (In the Na2O example, O) we have to divide the bond enthalpy by number of atoms in the molecule... life=saved. Again

thank you really helps

Perfect!

why did we double the 1st IE of Na rather than adding the 1st and 2nd IE's ?

Question - How do get +657 KJ for the EA of O2? I keep getting 753 - 141 = 612 KJ

@TrueStrongNorth

6 жыл бұрын

No one is coming to help you. :(

@fernandoduartemolina

2 жыл бұрын

It is 612 kJ mol^-1, he made a mistake in the video.

Thank you for the video. I have one question however that always seems to confuse me: how do you set the born haber equation at the end to find the enthalpy of formation or lattice enthalpy? I'm always confused on what to set as positive or what to set as negative. Thanks!

@ibchemvids

8 жыл бұрын

+Vincent Prochoroff In the new syllabus the IB have decided that lattice energy is now positive. Which means the arrow should point up (+ve = endo) The formation will always be negative and point down (exo)

@VincentProchoroff

8 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Hi Richard,Thanks for the video!!In your second example for the ionisation of sodium you say 2 x the 1st ionisation energy. Should it not be the 1st ionisation plus the 2nd ionisation energy that you use?? Can you clarify im confused.

@ibchemvids

8 жыл бұрын

+oliver ingham I need to make Na+ and another Na+ = 2x1st IE of Na I do not want to make Na2+ = 1st + 2nd IE of Na !

Fantastic video had my first lesson of a2 chemistry and was baffled by this :( I got a couple of silly questions : 1 why did you have to times the enthalpy change atomisation of Na by 2 ?

@ibchemvids

8 жыл бұрын

+Sam Hanly Because you need 2 Na atoms to make the ionic crystal in question.

Hi I noticed that the standard condition symbol wasn't present in the delta H thing and it's kind of important, for anyone giving CIE, OCR, IB examinations, you could lose easy marks, don't forget states in the brackets as well as the standard conditions symbol!!!

@ibchemvids

8 жыл бұрын

Indeed - the IB (praise be to them) normally have another question where the Standard Conditions are noted, to avoid any issues. But the sign should be there.

What would be the Born-Haber cycle for aluminium iodide?

it is very good video. thanks

@ibchemvids

6 жыл бұрын

ta

Hi Richard. Charco here, how you doing in your newish job. You are describing BH values for lattice enthalpy as theoretical (9:20). They are experimental values as the data is based on experimental data. Theoretical values are based on electrostatics theory, with ions as point charges, using the Madelung constant for instance (although there are other methods).

@ibchemvids

4 жыл бұрын

I believe you - but I was just following the IB - this was removed for the current syllabus - now I know why!

How do you know whether the electron affinity arrow is up or down?

@aliarshad9739

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you, I needed that, however sometimes, like in this example the arrow continued to go up.

@aliarshad9739

5 жыл бұрын

Also, the reason it was upwards was because if you add up the first and second electron affinities of Oxygen, it turns out to be positive, thus an endothermic reaction.

@oneinabillion654

5 жыл бұрын

@@aliarshad9739 The 1st electron affinity is bond between electron and nucleus. As we have learned, bond making is exothermic, thus negative (-). For the 2nd electron affinity, it would be hard to add another electron as now you would be adding electron to a negative charged ion that was formed from the 1st electron affinity. Therefore there will be repulsion between the ion and the electron, so more energy is needed to overcome this repulsion. So, this is endothermic (+) In conclusion, 1st electron affinity is always exothermic and 2nd electron affinity is always endothermic. The overall electron affinity can be positive or negative, depending on how exothermic or endothermic. In this video, the electron affinity is positive as the value of the 2nd electron affinity is more positive. The value of the 1st electron affinity is not negative enough to make the overall value negative. If anyone has a problem understanding my last paragraph, it just means that the magnitude of the 2nd electron affinity is larger than the 1st, so they add up to a positive number.

Great video! But isn't conversion of Na(s) to Na(g) delta H sublimation?

@ibchemvids

7 жыл бұрын

it is but the ib prefer atomisation. Sublimation of I2(s) would make I2(g) , which would not work since we need gaseous atoms, not gaseous molecules

thank you

What stage is the bond dissociation enthalpy in the first born haber cycle?

@ibchemvids

5 жыл бұрын

There are 2 ways to account for this stage: Atomisation of chlorine = making 1 chlorine atom from chlorine in its natural state = Cl2 This is the same energy change as breaking the bond in a Cl2 molecule thus making atomic chlorine The fact that we only need 1 Cl but have to make it from Cl2 accounts for the 1/2 popping up.

I have a question. Say you have to get 2 Cl- ions from 2Cl to make say MgCl2, then how do you calculate the enthalpy change there?

@ibchemvids

6 жыл бұрын

2X 1st Electron affinity - data booklet has this value

Your accent is gorgeous!

Nice one

I could watch @7:44 all day on loop

THANKS!!!

Yeah absolutely - but what about in the case of something like MgO Where Mg is 2+ Then you'd need 1st ionization energy plus 2nd. But i cant find it in the data booklet! Is it even there>? Or will i just not be asked such a question?

I was so scared whether u were talking to me 😂😂

awesome :)

@richardthornley When do I use atomization and when bond enthalpy? are they always interchangeable? I thought: bond enthalpy was breaking covalent bonds and enthalpy of atomization was breaking intermolecular forces to create complete separation

@ibchemvids

5 жыл бұрын

normally in IB they use the same trick atomisation of chlorine = 1/2 x bond energy of chlorine since both make one chlorine atom (g) atomisation is making atoms (g), either by breaking intermolecular forces or even intra if this will result in individual atoms.

@valeriechin7916

4 жыл бұрын

Richard Thornley But for this example here, one atom of oxygen isn’t made by one mole of O2 but , 1/2 a mole of O2?

Just wondering if the order matters? Like if I do the atomization of sodium then followed by the atomization of oxygen, and then do the ionization energy of sodium and electron affinity of oxygen, because I have seen it like that in some books. Also, where does bond disassociation fit in and is that required? Thanks.

@ibchemvids

8 жыл бұрын

+Elishbah Amer Order does not matter for the maths but if you are not methodical you may miss a step. You might be given the bond energy for Cl2. So this much energy will produce 2 x Cl atoms = 2 x delta H atomisation. Its just another way to try to trip you up!

@elishbah123

8 жыл бұрын

Richard Thornley Yes, I guess I should probably stick with this way to be on the safe side, thanks!

That should be deltaH bond dissociation. of 1/2Cl2 molecule

too good

Oh Mr. Kelley 😂👌🏾

IB exam in 5 hours bless bro! praying this doesn't come up 😭

@ibchemvids

2 жыл бұрын

🤞

Thanks sir

I wish I could just watch these instead of going to my chemistry classes; watching these, reading through one's textbook and doing lots of practice questions would be perfectly sufficient to score a good grade in IB chemistry I should think :) Because these videos are absolutely brilliant :))

The equation I was taught to memorize is LE (lattice energy) + delta H of formation = atomisation + IE + EA... but in your example your LE is pointed towards the other direction from delta H of formation... Why? :S

@ibchemvids

10 жыл бұрын

IB accepts it either way. Making 1 mole of the lattice from its gaseous ions (exo, arrow down)OR separating 1 mole of the lattice into its gaseous ions (endo, arrow up)

will i be marked wrong if i inter-change the enthalpy change of atomisation for Na and the enthalpy change of Cl?

@ibchemvids

6 жыл бұрын

nope

isn't the 1st ionization energy different from the 2nd? if so, then why did you double the 1st ionizatoin energy?

@HugTheSlenderman

8 жыл бұрын

+MuchWow69 Assuming you're talking about ~6:48, he was saying that he was removing one electron from two moles, so double the first ionization energy (second ionization energy would be if he had removed two electrons). If you look at Na in that part, you'll notice it's missing one electron due to this.

Hi, I have three questions. First, how do you know how many times to ionize? Second, why is it 1/2Cl2 (I understand that there is only 1 mole of the compound, but I don't understand why its 1/2Cl2. eg in MgCl2 how come it becomes Cl2 not 1/2Cl2)? Third in my data booklet the electron affinity is -141 and + 753 which becomes 612 rather than 657? Are they suppose to be different or am I doing something wrong? Thank you

@ibchemvids

6 жыл бұрын

1st - group 1 metals need to lose 1 electron, group 2 need to lose 2. If the metal appear twice eg Na2O, you need to make sure you double your value. i.e. 2 x1st IE for Na 2nd MgCl2 needs Cl2, but NaCl needs only 1/2Cl2. You have to use the chlorine in its standard state = Cl2 AND you only need 1 chlorine atom, so it has to be half. 3rd in my data book I agree with you. The IB like to change the data in the data booklet - this is a pain in the arse.

@csastra7588

6 жыл бұрын

ohh i see, thank you!

I imagine Mr. Kelly wouldn't be too pleased with this video?

What if you have a subscript of 3 like idk NaCl3 or anyother would it turn into 1/3 istead of 1/2?

hi, how did you find the enthalpy change of atomisation for Na? at 6:37

@ibchemvids

6 жыл бұрын

it is not in the booklet - you are either given it or you must calculate it.

3:51 had to do a double take just to make sure that I heard what I really that I heard lmao

@greypoint000

7 жыл бұрын

What did he say? I didnt quite hear/understand him

@poopmaster1911

7 жыл бұрын

ea games challenge everything

@greypoint000

7 жыл бұрын

lol oh ok thx

life saviourrrrrr