I'm a fellow attorney and this is, bar none, the BEST explanation of the binding and persuasive authority system I have yet found on the internet. Well done, sir.

I can't believe I found this I have been truly struggling w this concept and this helped so much. Thank you!

I am just starting a paralegal education and this series of videos was very helpful! It was explained in plain english and every term was broken down into terms I could follow. Thank you!!

This is the best explanation I have ever seen, heard or read of binding and persuasive authorities (2nd yr. paralegal student). Thank you! MORE PLEASE

This is wonderful, thank you for investing your time to enlighten us.

Starting Paralegal education, this was very helpful thank you.

This subject makes so much more sense now, thank you!

I am in the Temple College Criminal Justice program in Temple, Texas. This REALLY helped me understand how I need to write my paper that is about the Pervis Tyrone Payne case. Thank you!!

@lrwprof

10 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching, and thanks for your comment. I'm glad it was helpful!

Very helpful for my Business Law class. Thanks!

Wow. That was REALLY well done!!! Now it all makes sense!!! whoa. Gonna have to take a break and let me brain digest this!!! Thanks!!! You were an excellent "brain food chef"!!! TASTY Knowledge presentation!!! :)!!! :D!!! THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO EXPLAIN THIS!!! :)!!! :D!!!

Watching this video totally explained it in easy to follow steps and examples.It's like Political Science for Dummies! Thank you sir!

I put on *2 and it worked very well. It is very informative sir. Thanks from Iran

great explanation of this process! Thank you!

I'm watching these to get notes for a law class I'm taking, and these are REALLY useful, thank you!

@lrwprof

10 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching -- I'm glad you find them to be helpful! Can I ask where you are taking your law class?

Thank You! Thank You! Thank You!!! Your video really helps. Please continue to make more. =)

Thank you. This was very helpful. Please make more videos!

This video is amazing. The examples explain the concept very well.

Your great at explaining this concept. clear and concise! Thank you

This is excellent! You explained it beautifully.

Great videos, thanks for sharing with us!

Thanks for posting this, I found it really helpful.

If the district court in NY already ruled on the case as not guilty, why it would go to the 2nd cir? Isn't that considered double jeopardy?

Awesome video great info and well said

great Explanation!

Great explanation. Thank you!

thankyou so much very informative

Thank you!! Very helpful!

An honest politician is an endangered species in DC. Very rare.

Question- in your example, after SCOTUS grants cert to the DC circuit and rules that killing an endangered species- no matter the intent- is guilty, what happens to the first guy in the western district of New York who killed the wolf? Does his not guilty verdict get overturned? Or would cert have to be filed again?

Whats funny is that I'm studying law, these youngsters don't understand this before you put this up. I've been a lay student of law for years, and now I'm in law school and challenging my professors. And this simple understanding of local, state, and federal judicial processes eludes them until you explain it to them.

@jacobg9262

2 жыл бұрын

Old gunner

If the defendant is found not guilty in the district courts, is the prosecutor then barred from continuing to seek a criminal conviction in the appellate / circuit courts?

@adamkendall997

5 жыл бұрын

I need to know this too. I live in the northern district in Illinois.

Very good!

SO now that there is a binding decision from the Federal supreme court, What happens to the previous decision of 2nd Circuit ( Non guilty). Are the decisions changed retrospectively and are people tried again? Or visa versa if the binding decision came out as being "Not guilty" are people freed from the penalty of 9 Circuit code?

@lrwprof

10 жыл бұрын

No, past judgments are not changed retroactively. But the losing party may be able to request some sort of review of the case in light of the new precedent (through an appeal, petition, or post-judgment motion), if the time for the requested review has not expired.

i understood very well

I using this as notes in my Business law case, at AAMI this is really helpful. Thank you Also that means that the Supreme court is the only court that can make a precedent binding?

fantastic explanation, tons of applauds to you, thank you. one question? will the guy from 2nd circuit who shot wild wolf be found guilty after supreme court's decision? thank you!

@lrwprof

8 жыл бұрын

+Begzod DavronoV Good question. Please see below for my response to a similar question from Robin Singh about a year ago.

Have you explained to them the difference between trial law, and appellate law?

The concept of stare decisis is much clearer now. (I wish I could draw so I could illustrate the notes I am taking while watching the videos, too). My question is: how does it work on the state level? Will there be set a precedent valuable for the whole of the state if a state supreme court rules something?

@lrwprof

8 жыл бұрын

+desbonsbons Yes, state court precedent is established very similarly. But the intermediate courts are sometimes structured differently in state court systems (see my video on the State Court System). In California, for example, the holdings of the different districts of the Court of Appeal are technically binding on all of the trial courts in California. That is in contrast to how trial courts in the federal court system are only bound by circuit court holdings that come from their specific circuit.

@desbonsbons

8 жыл бұрын

+Eugene Kim Thank you very much for the comment. It has been most helpful.

so the first one about the 2nd circuit is persuasive precedent while the last one about the DC circuit is binding precedent?? am I right about what I understood from your video?

Yooo this helped me so much hahahaha

a bear to a cat ah no haha

I absolutely would not survive law

“stare decisis” is a Latin phrase and must be pronounced in the Latin original language. Yours is the new anglolatin crap

@TheSuperk25

3 жыл бұрын

Go make your own video Latin tutorial then.

@billthewhitebear

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheSuperk25 not concerning my comment people without law tradition or others without the necessary background to follow law discipline

@TheSuperk25

3 жыл бұрын

@@billthewhitebear Well, most people here are just happy to grasp the concept of stare decicis. Your comment could have been educational but the "crap" ruins it. You are probably one of the smart kids in the class, but you are heavily disliked by your peers, because you are a prick and self-absorbed a$$hole.

@jacobg9262

2 жыл бұрын

Must be pronounced that way? Or what? The Latin police hunt you down? Let’s care about something important.

@billthewhitebear

2 жыл бұрын

@@jacobg9262 It is very important. This shows that you have actually studied in depth the source of law. Roman law is the mother source of English and Continental law