This video is sponsored by Hasselblad - so keep that in mind while watching the video. I wanted to give you a 3rd party perspective with Angel.

@TheShelbinator3000

10 ай бұрын

Honestly, this is irresponsibly disclosed. Disclaimer needs to be in the intro -- people click around after that point, and most don't get to the end or head to the comments. Sponsorship is expected but burying the disclosure is an insult to the audience.

@juan2luna

9 ай бұрын

I was shocked to hear only at the end that the video is 1- sponsored, 2-by Hasselblad !!! This is not serious.

@yogeshverma6301

7 ай бұрын

@@juan2luna its an infomercial at best. people cant be taking this seriously and making purchasing decisions based on this.

@Sickoloko24

2 ай бұрын

Really disappointed this should be stated on the begging of the video this is shady practice you just guys lost a subscriber and earned a dislike.

I stopped listening when you said sponsored by Hasselblad. Surprise surprise you found it to be the better camera. It also costs 50% more than the Fuji here in the UK

@bjunte2113

7 ай бұрын

This

@tobefree3718

7 ай бұрын

KZread product reviewing is such bs.

@nishadbabu5249

7 ай бұрын

And unfortunately this prestigious brand is owned by a Chinese firm.

@inarishrine

6 ай бұрын

You can say thanks to Brexit because the price of the Fuji on there website is 7999€ and the hasselblad is 8699€ so not that much of a difference. I would surely put 700€ more for better built camera, the price is already really expensive for both. The main difference will be the price of lenses I think

@theinnerdreamer7043

5 ай бұрын

But it’s not better built! It’s 10x slower then Fuji and unusable in 90% of scenarios. Lenses are also 4-6 grand apiece… Fuji 1-3 grand… can also get the 100s for 4,500…

"Brought to you by Hasselblad", 12 minutes in - All you need to know.

“Brought to you by Hasselblad” should have been mentioned at the beginning, not near the end. And yeah remember the Hasselblad is currently £2,000 more expensive.

Sponsored comparison videos aren’t about what the “reviewer” is saying, but more about what they don’t say. For example, when he pushes the HSL for both images he points out where the Hasselblad looks better, but conveniently leaves out where it looks worse. If you look at how the colors are rendered on the cement underneath the car you will see that the Hasselblad looks much worse than the Fujifilm.

Nice comparison, but in fact, that this video IS SPONSORED by Hasselblad, makes me doubt in the honesty of this comparison. In my opinion, Fuji has an internal color adjustment which could lead to same results.

Woah i dont normally see comparisons done with these types of expensive high end cameras. Interesting to watch 👌

I'd be so nervous holding both of those cameras in my hands 🤣😱😱

Why are you not using Phocus, to actually get the HNCS? Also when you are looking at the Fuji file, why is the profile set to adobe color, and not the Fuji profile you shot with?

@juanstevens873

9 ай бұрын

This is what I always see in every video that compares these cameras. They pull out Lightroom or Camera One. They never use the manufacturers software to get true colors. Smh. And I'm sorry. Hasselblad and Leica both have to sponsor all these KZreadrs to do videos and try to get people to buy their overpriced equipment. They still haven't caught up with Fujifilm in terms of operational capabilities. Come on. And the GFX100II is about to drop.

@nickguzman1734

7 ай бұрын

​@@juanstevens873I think it's just a push from DJI in general. Lots of their products have been marketed as soooo amazing from KZreadrs lately

@mikechapman3557

4 ай бұрын

Yea

@nessandromendoza797

4 ай бұрын

Dude has no idea what color profiles are

@RobertoMonachello

3 ай бұрын

because almost every youtuber has no idea about what he/she is doing.

Cool! Thanks for sharing it. Nice work. ✌️

I've worked with the GFX system for a few years now and I've always been curious about Hasselblad. The colors look amazing.

The value of this "review" is reduced to zero when I discover 12 MINUTES into the video that it was SPONSORED by Hasselblad. You need to LEAD with that information. I'm glad you mention that in a pinned comment, but comments don't automatically show up on a phone. It almost feels like I've wasted 13 minutes of my life to go through all of this review and then to find out at the end that one of the cameras in the review PAID FOR THE REVIEW. That's not a review but an AD. Also, too much importance is placed on "sharpness" and other factors that can be addressed sufficiently in post production. It's apples to oranges when shooting with different lenses also. Final comment. DON'T place an $10,000 camera and lens on the very edge of a desk that is in the background of some of this video.

@dayeah765caoni3

16 сағат бұрын

Zero value of your comment as well

I have been waiting for a video like this to come out!

Well that was a waste of time. Right at the end....sponsored by Hasselblad. And I was thinking why the gold reflector in some shots? Which ones? Apples and pears. I am sure the Hassenkad is excelent. Best looking camera ever. Used review.

I’ve looked at tons of comparisons of these two cameras and the Hasselblad is consistently sharper with nicer colours. But it would be my pick based on the feel in hand and leaf shutter.

Wow, very interesting to this type of video! Nice to see the difference of these two cameras. Hasselblad's color is very impressive, especially green color, wish I can have an Hasselblad X2D of my own.

thanks for the comparison files - I downloaded the raw files and the differences are very interesting indeed. Using LR and C1 it still amazing to see how more "accurate" and lifely the Hasselblad colors are - which is btw also my experience using the X1D II 50 and comparing the files with my Leica SL 2 system (which already produces great files) . Really one needs to do this comparison oneself.

@thechrishau

10 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@RedShiftedDollar

9 ай бұрын

Anyone interested in accurate colors is using a calibration chart. It would have been a much better comparison if the colors were calibrated for this test, otherwise you are just comparing the "preferences and settings" of the camera based on what the user selected or adjusted in post.

Something is off with this promo. Should have said at the beginning that you are Hassy connected.

The Hasselblad looks to have more accurate colour whereas the Fuji looks more film stock inspired. For the type of images I make I suspect I would have more fun with the Fuji GFX. Would love to try both of them out 1 day.

This is an awesome camera.

I haven't had any muddy color look when I shoot from my GFX100S, so that is weird.

@NotStockPhoto

6 күн бұрын

I’ve shot the original 100 since the day it came out and same with it and the new 100ii I just got…….. but I’ve only been shooting cars professionally for 25 years so I have no clue what I’m doing 😂

I really enjoyed this video, and I have to say that Hasselblad appeals more to me . The sharpness and overall image quality are top-notch. Great comparison video, guys! 👍

This video just convinced me to get a GFX 😂

@Dukeofvampires1

10 ай бұрын

much cheaper as well

Hey guys, love the comparisons! Can you tell me what software you used to review the pix? And the monitor? Figure I'll have to make some purchases! Thanks!

I was waiting for this video!!!

Thanks for the test photos Chris!! Can I please ask for the Fuji as well? Thank you!

I think the fuji looks nicer, looks more like film. Suits the retro car vibe much better imo

Compare two camera with different focus length / distance / angel ...... GREAT JOB! lol

It reminds me on an episode from Friends, when you say "Porscha" (thats what I hear). It is a Porsche - there is a "e" at the end. It is pronounced like "e"mpty or "e"pisode.

I actually think GFX100S provides more natural, less saturated tones....

When you import the Hasselblad files using Phocus software you have 1 more stop of dynamic range and other benefits. Then you can use any other photo software.

It looked like the Hasselblad images were a little under exposed. Hasselblad optics are probably a little better than Fuji?

@CallMeRabbitzUSVI

10 ай бұрын

Correct, by underexposing he can push the exposure alot more before blowing out. And the Hasselblad lens is sharper, something Chris and company failed to talk about.

Quote: brought to you by Hasselblad. Quite a shameless piece of sponsoring, I may say.

Love this video!

Just for information, SONY makes and sells HASSELBLAD X2D sensors🙂

@aristidelisimaco

9 ай бұрын

Fuji too

You cant use a non camera profile.. That's NOT the brand intented colors..

From the sample here, Fuji's red is orange-red, just like a lot of other digital cameras. Hasselblad handles red really well.

I've been shooting with the GFX 100S for a while now and the "red" issue has been my only gripe. When shooting in Provia, reds look orange. Switching the color profile to Pro Neg Std and bumping up the saturation helps, but it's not perfect. It's such a strange thing that irritates and confuses me about an otherwise amazing camera. I wish Fuji would do something about this. It's the only serious flaw I've noticed with the colors on the GFX.

You should had to compare X2D vs. GFX 100II instead of GFX100s.

Why not compare the new GFX100 II with the Hasselblad since they're close in price?

Damn, the way you guys went about editing the photos in the most wrong way for Fuji 😬 Just say you hate them the way its being treated

@kylewist7745

6 ай бұрын

Video is sponsored by Hasselblad. What did you expect?

interesting video but Hasselblad won everything. is there, not a single critique you can give it, even something minor? I know it's sponsored but still.

Downloaded the sample files. How is it that I'm able to open the sharpness comparison .RAF file in Phocus? Is there something unique about that Fuji Raw file? None of my other .RAF files will open in Phocus.

also failed to mention that one is half the price of the other

Fuji's systems are more focused on emulating a film look with their files? So it really doesn't make sense to compare them against true to life colors.

Why are you comparing colors, did you used grey card or something? And i think the comparison was biased

Fuji gives a far better value. Dirt cheap compared to Hasselblad, but not the least bit inferior. Fuji is in fact outselling all competition by quite a long shot. This is also true for Fuji in the DX format.

Gorgeous Dope car and damn cool model! 😍🥰

Wow, the Hasselblad X2D camera body looks absolutely stunning compared to the Fujifilm gfx100s. I'm really impressed with the Hasselblad's color rendition as well 📸👌

we've come to a point in life where porsche 911 is no longer clickbait worthy

Fuji colors are really pleasing to look at

they say Hasseblad is useless for action because of its shutter tech, is it true?

This video is definition that better gear doesnt make you better photographer

@plrrt

8 ай бұрын

Or a reviewer in this case. what a sham. Both amazing cameras though. I own a gfx 100s and was curious about the hassie but this is such a flawed review.

Where is the phase 1 IQ3/100 in the race?

red is the most difficult to reproduce for digital sensors. Hasselblad has a quality there

isn't Fuji's base iso 100?

There is something called white balance, play with it and you can get any colors you prefer. Fuji is $7500. If money is not the concern, get hasselblad.

Unbiased review sponsored by Hasselblad 👍🏻

Love the sponsored video.. Guess who won

Fuji has won!!! Bravo man, it shows Fuji has slightly better handling of bright colors 👍👌 Too notch Fuji, well done 👏👏

With all due respect, anyone claiming better Hasselblad colors or "color science" likely does not fully understand the complete process of digital photography. The sensor and camera are only 2 of the 3 critical elements producing what you see or measure in the raw image. The third is the raw import software. It appears that Lightroom was used to import raw images from both cameras. The fact is, one cannot compare "raw" vs "raw" without involving the raw converter. As any Fuji user would agree who has used both importers, Capture One gives more vibrant raw colors than Lightroom. That would be the only fair comparison to the Hasselblad. For example, your comparison of reds like at 7:12 is completely understood as a result of Lightroom raw converter.

BOTH ARE JUDGE AND DOSE DIFFERENT WITH SAME SONY IMAGE SENSORS ...

Fuji for life!

I think you guys need to talk about the glass that each camera came with. It's not just about the camera bodies as y'all know. It would have been even better if you guys had broken that element down w/the shots captured. Otherwise I liked this video n will always shoot w/my Hasselblad over Fuji any day! 🤟📷🔥

@SneakyCaleb

Ай бұрын

Lenses make a bigger difference than anything so yeah I agree

So why do they not zoom in and let us see because that’s all they’re doing is having it the size that they can see zoom in and make it two or 300% so we can see it as well. These goofy are definitely has a blast fan boys.

Hassy colors are the best. That’s subjective opinion. But I like all Hassy photos from way Way before x1/2d

I only buy Hasselblad over Fuji if they can record 8K

the hasselblad pic quality is definitly better. Fuji is a wayy better camera for its stats and its price

Oh yeah, Such . Sponsored video as if you were very objective to begin with. Where's my Gh5 🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️🚶🏾‍♂️

That red slant nose though

Cameras will evolve to a Hubble telescope 😩

I'm so mad I watched 12 mins of this to find out it's sponsored by Hasselblad.

Comparing the price difference from Both cameras and lenses, well done Fujifilm

Very poor to not disclose the sponsorship right at the start. I don't like being tricked into watching advertising.

HASSELBLAD.❤.

Paid by Hasselblad infomercial! take it with a grain of salt.

Hey Chris love this video, I do have one thing to bring up as I would love to see you review the images a little differently. I shoot on Hasselblad and after a lot of testing I noticed there were major colour shifts in Lightroom with the Hasselblad files. If you process the Hasselblad images in Phocus you will see a massive difference between even the Hasselblad images you did in Lightroom and the ones out of Phocus. There are major changes between Botha yellows, reds and greens. Would love to see you do a video on this. Keep up the amazing work. Cheers Devon ✌🏼

Use me as the like button if you thought the Fuji files were better ❤

Sponsored advertisement dressed up as a product comparison. This should be (and probably is) illegal.

GFX all of way!!!!

A sponsored comparison video? Feels a little icky…

@tor2919

10 ай бұрын

Almost all reviews on KZread are sponsored. Unless a reviewer has paid for a camera with their own money, it’s sponsored. Most of the big KZreadrs like Gerald undone get cameras sent to them by the camera companies. That’s not independent journalism and should be considered sponsored. At least the guy who made this video is transparent about it

@RobertVanderStelt

10 ай бұрын

I agree. I get why KZreadrs do it, but its a bit disappointing.

@thechrishau

10 ай бұрын

I appreciate your comment. This is the creative concept the brand wanted produced. I was transparent with letting the audience know that it was sponsored. So take the information as it is. At the end of the day - you can see the comparisons side by side. Nothing was jigged to make the photos perform better or worse - same settings and similar glass. I hope this means you can form your own opinions. Angel was there to be a third party and give his opinion. The money was used to rent cars, pay for editors, models and camera systems rentals for the shoot. I shared my thoughts but at the end of the day you can form your own opinion on it hopefully by looking at the side by sides. Thanks!

@RobertVanderStelt

10 ай бұрын

@@thechrishau 👏👏👏 this is how you engage with the community when someone is critical,has feedback on your content.

@davo733

10 ай бұрын

Transparent? You mention it's sponsored towards the end of the video so briefly it's easy to miss. Should be in the intro. Feels deliberate. @@thechrishau

Sponsored by Hasselblad comparison? 🤣🤣🤣 What should we expect? Honest oppinion? 😂😂😂

The GFX is leagues ahead of the Hasselblad - far superior functionality and better colour in the right hands - Hasselblad is super pretty but that's it.

vote for pedro

different lens, different color science. This is not a review.

Is this Fox or MSNBC? 🤨

Brought to you by Hasselblad Haha...... Check your settings in cameras chaps......at least set them up right to begin with.. lol... and sharpness with be part of the algorithm on the manufacturers processor.... Come on guys...

CHRIS, you as a canadian with german parents, you should know its not porscha :D :D :D

@georgdresel4809

10 ай бұрын

it seems so very strange kind of conversion or kit?

@thechrishau

10 ай бұрын

I worked with the brand one time and they drilled the way I was supposed to say it. I’m positive I’m saying it right :)

@georgdresel4809

10 ай бұрын

@@thechrishau I d really be interested what kind of "Porsche" this is - I m not aware of this model... it seems like a conversion?

Hau do you spell shill? 😂

I had a look at all the photos you have included for the download, but it is really difficult to draw a conclusion on these cameras. There is one Fujifilm photo for the download but none of you Hasselblad photos were shot in the same lighting condition or framed/shot in the condition as the fuji camera, I can see the Fuji photo was shot in harsh lighting condition while the girls in the Porche was shot clearly under a shadow for the Hasselblad, for a fairer comparison you should have included the photos shot under similar light conditions. Also in your video when comparing the section of green grass you are comparing two different section of the image from both cameras. I noticed you used both 80mm lenses for this comparison and the photo with the bloke in the car, you kind of zooming in closer to Hasselblad photo then commented how sharp the image was without actually zooming in on Fuji photo this is what we want to see.

Let's put the Hasselblad sponsoring of this video aside for a sec, but why not use the base color profile on the Fuji instead of Adobe color?

These are hassle blast fan boys…!!! 😂😂

lightroom is crappy with fuji films ... capture one is much much better

9:59 Lowest ISO is not equal to base ISO. The GFX starts at 100.

dude, you are looking at a non-pro monitor, you are looking at monitor colors, not colors as saved in raw... sigh.

The autofocus of Hasselblad is much worse really it is useless. Proven by other reviews.

Raw fails???🙏

Stuppid test. Which camera with, is calibrated the monitor? I alredy have an X2D and I have calibrate my monitor with it by an expert. The calibration profile stored at experts program for print use with the same parameters! Witch of the steps of this protocol have you follow? No one I think! Your test sucks!

These goofballs do not know what they’re doing…!!! 😂

2 Biased Hasselblad boys talking about the comparison. Use different film simulations if you want better greens for landscape and if you want softer shadows. Nonsense