2nd ❤ From this list my favourite Fighter jet is Saab Jass 39 Gripen

That's a lot of money, but air superiority is invaluable.

6:08 For the airframe and mission equipment only, the Lot 15-17 cost of F-35s ranges “from $70.2 million to $69.9 million for the F-35A, $80.9 million to $78.3 million for the F-35B, and $90 to $89.3 million for the F-35C,” a Lockheed spokesperson said.

@huseyinmehmetaltun2046

Жыл бұрын

that price was before covid and that time LM already was complaining about costs and they told costs will be higher than estimated. 122m will most likely be increased if the inflation continues like this

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@huseyinmehmetaltun2046 122M will not be the price of the F-35, even after Covid. As you failed to read in the comment before yours there are 3 versions of the lightning II, A, B, C, a regular one, less expensive, a carrier based version, a bit more expensive, and a vtol, wich is the most expensive of all three. Regardless, as so many are being produced, and already were, the number for unit will be cheaper, mainly on the most produced version - the more you produce, less the final product cost: basic ecomics. Cheers.

@stanimal8

Жыл бұрын

I don't think this site has any clue what the current procurement prices of these planes are. Most of the prices are off by 25-50%.

@fgtrhwu2

Жыл бұрын

@@huseyinmehmetaltun2046 He said that this year though

@DIREWOLFx75

Жыл бұрын

"a Lockheed spokesperson said" And there you have the problem. When was the last time anything regarding cost, where what they claimed had any connection to reality? The F-35 is in reality HIDEOUSLY expensive. USA is massively subsidizing it in multiple ways to the point that it's nearly impossible to figure out the true cost. The figures you quote however, isn't even in the same reality. Double them and you're probably much closer to correct. Anyone who honestly thinks the F-35 can be had cheaper than Gripen is in desperate need of a shrink.

If more F22s were allowed to be built, the unit cost most likely would have come down!

As many others have commented, very difficult to set a fixed price. F35 is probably heavily subsidized by US taxpayers for the use as a tool for the state department. Gripen cost is between 60 and 110 milliion USD depending on C or E version as well as the included equipment and tech transfer. Rafael price probably include much of the above and take in consideration loss of tech knowledge to competitors and enemies when selling it.

Realy I like this powerful fighters jets

Unfortunately the majority of the figure you give are incorrect making me question the accuracy of any and all content from this channel.

@waynemongo

4 ай бұрын

Sexy voice though! Is it robot or real lady??

No, the F-35A is 71 million a shot. The BAE Typhoon II Tranche 3 is about 140 million dollars per unit. The F-22 hasn't been made since 2011. Kind of apples an oranges.

Is that Su-35 @ 1:43 with covered canopy unmanned?

@adelinewar3222

Жыл бұрын

I guess so

Wiki says F 22 can cost up to $380m 🫨

@owenlien1593

Жыл бұрын

The price will always be different just depends on a lot of things I think that number might be how much it would cost to star production back up

@I_am_MeriumT

Жыл бұрын

Look at this guy still believing wiki, it says $380M because that's the cost of basically the research associated with each fighter respectively

@ChandranPrema123

Жыл бұрын

​@@I_am_MeriumT 380 million$ way back in 2005

@JohnCarlyle

Жыл бұрын

@@I_am_MeriumT And that's exactly how costs work. You don't sell a jet based on the cost of the raw materials.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

First, it would only cost to the US, since export was banned. Second, there will be no price for F-22 to come because none will; all line of production was dismantled and the US are not able to produce any more - it's simply more economic to invest on the NGAD and F/A XX them resuming and older frame to production. Till there F-35's must do their roles alongside USAF and Navy 4 gen Eagles II and Super Hornets - plus some 170+ F-22 produced and I would say the US will lead in the air confortably till the 6th gen, and still be prevalent in the skies.

2:37 McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle X Boeing F-15EX Eagle II

This scale is not realistic because the real cost from a fighter jet is not only the buying cost but the full life cost (maintenance and upgrades) ,and with this parameter is the F35 EXTREMLY EXPANSIVE, much more than the Rafale or the Eurofighter Typhoon...For me is today the best fighter jet the F22, (and i'm french), but because of high upgrade costs are the F22 not up to date in some detection sensors or anti missile laser systems...

En iyisi Kaan...!

@DhoZobanga-rn5le

10 ай бұрын

🇹🇷

Make a cheap version fighter jet too

Waiting for this information by long time

Where does the information come from that the Su 57 costs 100 million?

@martinkarasek5939

Жыл бұрын

Random number generator, same as many other numbers in the video.....

F3R with the 🇬🇷 thank you buzz ps SU 34n and KF 21

@georgesotiriadis9035

Жыл бұрын

Καλή Ανάσταση , αδερφέ !!! Εύχομαι πάντα υγεία και ότι καλύτερο για την Ελλάδα μας !!! 🇬🇷

@christosbekas7446

Жыл бұрын

@@georgesotiriadis9035 ναι ρε φιλε καλη ανάσταση και έχεις και πάντα τύχη στην ζωή σου

@fordgalaxie7623

Жыл бұрын

​@@georgesotiriadis9035 ελπίζω να τα γράφεις από την κ0λ0χωρα1🇬🇷 σου και όχι από καμιά άλλη νορμάλ χώρα 😅. Γιατί αγαπάτε την χωματερή σας αλλά προς το ζην βγάζετε σε άλλες χώρες. Κ0λ0εθνος

1

expensive to produce or to buy?

I have seen that LM took an upfront development payment of $200B rather than amortise over the production run. Assuming 3000 units that is $66M a unit. So a quoted $90M price is subsidised by the US taxpayer for $66M rather than an upfront $155M cost. LM is getting many international sales on the back of US taxpayers. I have not gotten my commission check but I am sure LM executives have.

@adelinewar3222

Жыл бұрын

Interesting !

@Legion-xq8eo

Жыл бұрын

I bet the stockholders and politicians got their checks as well!!

@paulchung9921

8 ай бұрын

LM is a leech unto the nation and they care more for money than making the best for the US military...

10 cheapest pls

Development costs for Chinas were paid for by the USA though. Lol.

@visionshader6549

Жыл бұрын

Really?

@peterhsieh380

Жыл бұрын

Are you insulting American intelligent??

@agrajmishra6128

Жыл бұрын

​@@peterhsieh380 the way confidential US docs are being leaked.....its nothing shocking

@adelinewar3222

Жыл бұрын

Why?

@harshitsinghbisht8044

Жыл бұрын

Why though ?

The Eurofighter famously cost the Brits more per airframe than the Raptor cost the Americans.

Hi

Pesawat tempu yang dibeli pak Prabowo , termasuh disini nggak ya ?

The cost for the Gripen is overstated because of how SAAB includes a lot of expensive but very convenient extras in their contracts. The cost for the Rafale is PROBABLY somewhat overstated for similar reasons as the Gripen. The cost for the F-22 is enormously understated because it's not based on actual production. Even if the ability to restart production had not been destroyed, actual pricetag to build new ones today would likely be somewhere around 400 million $. But with the cost for actually recreating the ability to produce them added? Probably 500-700M$. The cost of the F-35 is grossly understated because of USAs subsidies. Its actual per unit cost is way above the Typhoon. And comparisons made is that you can get 2 Rafale for the price of one F-35, or 4 Gripen. The cost for the F-15EX is LAUGHABLY understated for similar reasons as the F-22.

@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617

Жыл бұрын

Every item on this list are wrong.

@Chiungalla79

Жыл бұрын

How can it be similar reasons for the F-15EX when it is in production, and the reasons for the F-22 were that it isn`t?

@DIREWOLFx75

Жыл бұрын

@@Chiungalla79 "How can it be similar reasons for the F-15EX when it is in production, and the reasons for the F-22 were that it isn`t?" To a large extent i could have added the F-14 as well. If you try to make an exceptional aircraft and don't care what the costs are, when you use all the best proprietary tech you can put into it, then the aircraft becomes extremely expensive. And because US military industry enjoys their profit margins, they are also trying to push that direction even when it's not supposed to be the super expensive perfect best ever whatever. Which is how the F-35 became twice the price it was supposed to be so the US govt had to slap a huge amount of hidden subsidies on it to make it commercially viable.

@Chiungalla79

Жыл бұрын

@@DIREWOLFx75 Still don`t see how that applies to the F-15EX. No stealth, update to an old airframe and it`s not overly expensive in todays market. And even more important: You did not list any of those reasons for the F-22 in the first place. So going for "F-15EX for the same reasons as F-22" isn`t a viable option. But you did it anyway. Which casts doubt on everything you write from here on, because you are obviously not half as smart as you think you are. You are just selling bullshit with a ton of unfounded confidence here.

@lws7394

Жыл бұрын

Add to that the Saab Gripen is the most reliable plane , with by far the lowest running costs. The maintenance crew consist of 1 professional mecanic and 5 conscripts operating from a truck and the plane can land /take of from a 2-lane road ..

F16v is only $63m cost, it is not because it is cheaply made, it is because the maintenance is much easier to have lot of parts around the world.

@xuansu9036

Жыл бұрын

You are just writing out a word problem based on your interpretation of the formula. It doesn't mean the formula means what you have written. My interpretation is: You have 6 boxes of candy, and ate half of the them. each box has 1 hard candy and 2 soft candy. How many pieces did you eat. Which is obviously 9.

The SAAB is very cheap in running cost, can land "anywhere" and be back in action after 10 minutes. Electronics can be upgraded while in air as action is requested.

@patta8388

Жыл бұрын

The Gripen would be the perfect aircraft for a lot of the smaller air forces in europe, they'd get a lot more bang for their buck if they'd opted for it instead of the F-35. It's also a good platform for the "Hi-Lo" mix. Get Typhoons, Rafales, F-35's and bolster your numbers with a good chunk of Gripens

@inso80

Жыл бұрын

@@patta8388 Mixing is not really a good idea since they would require even more complex logistic chains, but for many, Gripen would be a very good, very cost effective platform. My country opted for F-35's after a extensive testing, but it might not be the best choice for everyone.

@patta8388

Жыл бұрын

@@inso80 Thing is, most medium sized air forces where this would be applicable already use different models of aircraft. Germany uses Typhoons and Tornados(soon to be replaced by F-35's), France uses Rafales and 2000's, etc.

@inso80

Жыл бұрын

@@patta8388 I don't think you understood my point, and neither the UK or France is a good example. Edit: looked more into it and both are bad examples. So is Germany.

Только не надо забывать, что для китайцев деньги вообще не имеют никакого значения. Они могут себе позволить миллиард самолётов по триллиону долларов за штуку.

@lexxsharingan1506

Жыл бұрын

Это как так вышло то? Ладно американцы, им весь мир деньги даёт и доллары покупает, про них такое ещё можно подумать, а китайцы как?

@romankovalev7894

Жыл бұрын

@@lexxsharingan1506 Легко и просто вышло. Если совсем упрощенно то доллары стали покупать после второй мировой когда 50% мирового производства было у Сша. Еаропа и Ссср в руинах. И продавали они все за доллары и внедряли его везде отдавая в заем и даже даря другим государствам. Сейчас ситуация поменялась. Уже в Китае 30% мирового производства и виноват в этом сам запад перенесший туда из жадности свои производства (план Киссинджера, до кучи усиливал тогдашний недружественный на тот момент Сссру Китай). Как то так

@lexxsharingan1506

Жыл бұрын

@@romankovalev7894 поэтому Китай как и прочие вкладывал млрд в гособлигации США, да? Производства есть по всему миру, в Европе после войны тоже появились, многие, и в Японии есть и т.д. Даже у нас что-то есть. Вопрос в технологиях и ресурсах, и конечно в возможности реализовать общий потенциал в живую, а не "в перспективе 2000-какого-ниудь года".

@romankovalev7894

Жыл бұрын

@@lexxsharingan1506 Да. Поэтому Китай и прочие вкладывали в госбумаги сша. Они были надежными, они сами все испортили. Репутация дело тонкое, а тут аресты денег, заморозки мутные. И Китай и Королевства Средиземноморья и другие толстые понимают что они могут быть следующими, без шуток. Сливают бумаги. Тенденция это десятилетняя - сейчас ускорилась просто. Смотрю новости Сша, разговоры о этом имеют быть. Сливают аккуратно чтоб не потерять сразу в деньгах. Самый крупный держатель это япония. Которая накосячила в мировую настолько что готова платить сша лишь бы те базы не убрали. Потому что их пинать все соседи будут и даже кореи обьединятся (почти не шутка). В цифрах количество платежей долларом по торговле снизилось с 79 до 49 % . И это китай агрессивно еще юань не двигает. Все и так получается у неторопливой обезьяны. Африка на 90% торгует китайским. Тайвань они без войны заберут, там законы китайские, идет интеграция, сама партия которая и свалила на остров - сейчас топит за возвращение. А это чипы. Посмотрим

@user-ob3ry1rl5m

Жыл бұрын

​@@romankovalev7894 производство уже не первый год уходит из Китая. Производство там уже совсем не так выгодно и дёшево как раньше. В связи с этим по перспективам дальнейшего роста экономики Китая большие вопросы. Более вероятна стагнация и даже кризис если Китай не диверсифицируется как страна, которая делает новые продукты, а не дёшево производит чужие. Тем более из-за санкций для РФ и её токсичности потенциально ожидается рост себестоимости производства китайской продукции, что, опять же, снова не в плюс для их конкурентоспособности. Пока в США производится (имеется ввиду интнллектуальная моставляющая) львиная доля новых и востребованных миром продуктов и технологий, страна, выступающая её станком производства никогда не будет сильнее экономически.

I thought the F-22 was 360 mil usd per unit?

@lissettelopez8331

Жыл бұрын

the initial costs of the Jet, is just a fraction of it's running costs. Maybe that was its life expectancy costs of operation.

The F-35 has been called "the most expensive weapons system of any kind ever undertaken by any military" by more than a few critics, so I'm failing to understand how they come out at #3. The F-22 is fully operational and a mature technology while the F-35 has been plagued with problems in its various essential systems, triggering comparisons to the Navy's ill-fated LCS(Little Crappy Ship) program in terms of utter, money wasting boondoggles.

@Skyline68230

Жыл бұрын

For the F-35, the development project was indeed by far the most expensive in history. The reason why the cost of development isn't that much reverberated on the price of a unit is because the F-35 has been initially ordered in a massive amount by the US military. Which simply makes the price go down.

@yomama629

9 ай бұрын

It's cost per unit, not cost per program. The F-35 program is the most expensive such program in the history of military procurement, but per aircraft the cost is less than $100 million. The F-22 on the other hand costs a lot per unit since a lot less of them were purchased, the price for an F-22 hovers around $200 million per unit. As for the developmental issues of the F-35, they have pretty much all been addressed, and the aircraft is now the most advanced and the most lethal thing in the sky

SU-35 Best aircraft

If you want to make a recording, make sure your phone is off!!

It's very funny now to listen about Su-57 advanced technology. Which exist only in warm russian dreams and cartoons. But high price - sure it's looks like true 😂. Developers achieved their budgets...

Excuse me miss buzz where is our beloved jets the f16 viper...?

@AnonymousSong

Жыл бұрын

Since F16 is a light to medium weight fighter jet, it costs much less than what mentioned above

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

It costs around 70 million.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@thenovicegamer007 the list starts with 85M...

Strike Eagle is a missile truck

阵风价格根本没有这么贵，这是卖给印度的售价而不是造假，造假不可能超过一亿美元😂，印度买这个被坑了

@ig-anzros01

Жыл бұрын

Bruh Indian rafale is advance than other Rafale

@fengfeng673

Жыл бұрын

印度买的阵风是2.3亿欧元

@binbi8177

Жыл бұрын

印度不买对的只买贵的

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Lol

@athrunzala6770

Жыл бұрын

@@binbi8177 India buys the rafale to the F4 standard .... moreover they do not buy only the planes but many other things in addition in particular a technological transfer

Ummmm, the J20 is the mighty dragon, I think south Korea has a black eagle.

@ytn00b3

Жыл бұрын

Young Falcon is South Korea's newest KF-21 and Black Eagle is their demonstration T-50B. China's J20 is Mighty Dragon which is correct but not sure if J20 has Black Eagle model

@nitonono4143

Жыл бұрын

lol, South Korea has Black Eagle only in Red Alert 2 or you are referring to the KAI T-50B Black Eagle trainer/light attack aircraft that ROKAF uses for aerobatic air show?

@skbj7838

Жыл бұрын

@@nitonono4143 Check KF-21.

Tomcat F-14 ❤

The Rafale is an incredible plane ! The best omnirole fighter by far !

@Orcen222

Жыл бұрын

F-35A says hello...

The Su-57 lacks of budget though, it cost the quality of an airplane to be that cheap being a 5th gen fighter jet

The F-22 was never exported because the US never wanted the world to know how bad it actually was, despite the hype !

@yomama629

9 ай бұрын

With a username like that you'd think you would refrain from writing something this stupid

Eurofighter Typhoon FTW

@fqeagles21

Жыл бұрын

Yeah probably the best 4th gen only behind 5th

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

​@@fqeagles21 I disagree. The Rafale is better and it has even beaten the Eurofighter, several times in war games.

@fqeagles21

Жыл бұрын

@@thenovicegamer007 With Eurofighter last Upgrade they are even

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

@@fqeagles21 How so? And even if that was the case, the Rafale is also getting an upgrade. The Rafale has got the superior EW suite and is second only to the American Growlers and F35s. It has better stealth, and has what is arguably the best BVR missile in the entire world. It is also nuclear equipped AND can fly from carriers.

@fqeagles21

Жыл бұрын

@@thenovicegamer007 you mean the Meteor?

F22 lack of HMD in the helmet😅😂😂😂🤦🤦🤦😡

What is the cost of f16 block 70/72?

@ytn00b3

Жыл бұрын

Brand new would cost $75~$85 million USD depending on options, for existing F-16C/D Block 50/52 upgrade kit to F-16V Block 70/72 would be around $30 million each kit.

@nitonono4143

Жыл бұрын

more than the F-35, JAS-39 E is also more expensive than the F-35. what this channel is referring to is the old JAS-39 C/D which production has already ended and has no support available for it anymore.

@ytn00b3

Жыл бұрын

@@nitonono4143 JAS-39E package cost is around $120M.

Croatia recently bought 12 Rafale's F3R version for around 900 mil...these info's are pure bullshit

tejas is the most expensive one😊

🤔

국민들 세금

As I know, B2 bomber is the most expensive.

What would be the cost of yf23 😅😅😅

@persistentparakeet3584

Жыл бұрын

More than the F22. 🤣🤣🤣

It´s a little bit funny that #10 Gripen and #01 F-22 are the proven best since 2006. Everyone else price tags are "very, very" creative like the American banks or the Drug industry set prices for their owner's needs of multiple Super Yachts (de Voss owns 10), Multiple Super luxury homes, Privet Jets, and Helicopters! Eurofighter costs too much because of the incompetent owners and why Rafale cost that much, has no explanation in logic. We can't see that either Eurofighter or Rafale is as good as JAS C.

WTF Our Comper SU-57 vs J-20 wtf is this

F22 best after that j20 and su57 comes

• Rafale B : 73 M€ TTC • Rafale C : 68 M€ TTC • Rafale M : 78 M€ TTC

SU - 35 for Serbie 💪🏼🇷🇸

UK get back TSR 2 walk all over this lot, pick up were they left of from 70s tempest British rolls Royce engine's, drone swarms, brush this lot aside.

What's the cost of Tejas Mk1a & Ka 50 aircrafts

@Standard_Aussie

Жыл бұрын

Probably not nearly as expensive because they aren’t close to the capabilities of these aircraft, and the ka50 is a helicopter not a fighter.

@bkjworld

Жыл бұрын

​@@Standard_Aussie his mean is Kai T 50 Korean Fighter , major Competitor of tejas mk1

@Standard_Aussie

Жыл бұрын

@@bkjworld ka50 and Kai t 50 are two very different things

@bkjworld

Жыл бұрын

@@Standard_Aussie Bro He Do Mistake , I know about Ka 50 Russian attack Helicopter

@Standard_Aussie

Жыл бұрын

@@bkjworld fair enough

F16 Viper...

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

still cheaper than the much more modern Saab Gripen E/F (the version shown in the video is the former D version, but still coming in a much more recent and reliable frame than the F-16; for some reason the gripen is a 4,5 gen and even the viper version remains a 4 gen jet)

@ElDomador04

Жыл бұрын

@@Maddog-xc2zv F16 Viper price 120 millions.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@ElDomador04 "Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 70/72: $64 million. The F-16 was created as a light and maneuverable fighter jet that would offer an affordable alternative to the F-15.Mar 29, 2021" you're stuburn... and yes, all block 70/72 are vipers, which includes the aesa radar and a lot of good new goodies; still, it's called the F-35 of the poor countries. Cheers

Fighter jets are becoming obsolete because cheap infrared cameras can detect hot exhaust gas made by their engines.

clearly rafale is the best compromise in this list when you know what he is able to do and the very low problems this jet has had

@Skyline68230

Жыл бұрын

Yup, Rafale, Gripen and probably also F-15 are the most cost-effective of this list.

U.S.should of produce more F-22s and less F-35s!

Please without translation!!!

05. Chengdu J-20 Mighty Dragon

Euro Typhoon Fighter Top2 wtf F-35 TOP3 haha 😅😂 Fake Video

The F-35 is a massive white elephant, jack of all but not the greatest of anything !

So the Eurofighter is more expensive than J-20, F-35 and SU-57... OK

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

It is.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@thenovicegamer007 less produced, cost raises. laws of economy

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

@@Maddog-xc2zv I am an economics student....

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

@@Maddog-xc2zv But since you bring it up, 600 units of the Eurofighter has been produced, while only 200 J20 and 16 Su 57 have been produced. STOP REPLYING TO ME with your half ass knowledge.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@thenovicegamer007 nice. phd, on the way to master on other subject. still a student (also), too.

the rafale is the most envied fighter

@xuansu9036

Жыл бұрын

I don't think ignoring parenthesis when there is a single number within is the problem. It's whether a number in front of ( ) without an explicit operator means an implicit multiplication which has the same order of priority as any other division and multiplication within the formula, or an implicit parenthesis around it which elevates the order of priority above other divisions and multiplications.

TF-X MMU?

@dimitriszis2281

Жыл бұрын

lol

Su-35 - very expensive shit... )

Falta el KF 21 sur corea

@oaao3387

Жыл бұрын

KF21 2026

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@oaao3387 It's already flying but it's cheaper than those shown, 60M+ each on the current version

@oaao3387

Жыл бұрын

@@Maddog-xc2zv KF-21 will not be mass-produced until 2026

@ig-anzros01

Жыл бұрын

not fully indigenous

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@ig-anzros01 almost no jet is nowadays. even the f-35 had multiple partners. the eurofighter same. olders, like panavia tornado, harrier... the list would grow up easily

F 22 not being built anymore. so what the f???

@joed8961

Жыл бұрын

yet it is still the most expensive one

Rafale shoots down F 16

Cheaper by the dozen?

F-16 and F/A-18E/f are too cheap for this list.

Le rafale ont dirait un jouet le plus moche des avions un fer à repasser 😂

Es geht doch eigentlich nicht um die virtuelle Schwanzlänge, also den "teuersten" zu haben, sondern wie man aus seinem Geld das Maximum herausholt.

lol SU-57 - 7? )))))))))))

pretty sure the cheaper fighter jets Mig-21 are more worth then any of these. Some are sold at 40 thousand dollars and the fully operational ones are sold at 185 thousand dollars. That means for the price of 150 millions i could either have 1 singular F-22 Raptor or 810 fully operational Mig-21. No matter how hard you try, your F-22 is not killing 810 Mig-21. That is when you know not to buy the scam jet. I'm not saying buy Mig-21. I'm saying there are many other jets that better the Mig-21 and far cheaper then those crap overpriced things. Like the Mig-29 or F-16 and F-18. Way more worth the price.

Fake video

USA Rapport ist eine Kiste hahaha 😂

Poorly researched click-bate

1:48 Sukhoi Su-35 Egypt.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

cancelled. don't you read the news?... poor radars and avionics, unsure maintenance and spare parts. that's already old history, mate

😁Chinese J-20 Feng Du copied from U.S F-22.

You say it as: Da Soh Rafal not Dasult Rafael Not being a smart ass but thats the way you say it.

Eurofighter Typhoon's main origin was the UK. Yes it was multinational though by that logic, so was the F-35 (with a sizeable British contingent in the R+D and manufacture of some of the F-35's components; though yes, the large majority of the F-35 is US originated) Eurofighter Typhoon was lead by the British and the UK has the most of them for a contributor and was by far the biggest R+D and manufacture input. Although there were many components made all over Europe, BAE Systems (UK based firm) had the biggest role. Eurofighter Typhoon's successive tranches (batches) of newer models provided lots of work for many British workers. Charitably you could call the Eurofighter Typhoon a mostly Anglo-German project, as nominally, the long-lasting arguments back in the 1990's and 2000's over who would produce what and in what numbers, between which countries, eventually resulted in the UK having a 37.42% majority share of the production numbers. Germany was 2nd at 29.03% of the total production. Italy was at 19.52% and Spain was at 14.03%. This also meant that the UK had more of a share of production than the 3rd and 4th biggest partners of the program put together, whereas Germany, the 2nd biggest partner, did not (though not by much) Therefore the UK was definitely the leading partner of the project. It was born out of British Aerospace work going back to 1971, by it's own origins. The UK had been pushing for a modern jet fighter from that time onward, which could meet the demands of fulfilling the air superiority fighter role as well as some ground attack and bombing missions. It is important to contextualise this in relation to the state of play in the 1970's and 1980's, with the Cold War very much still ongoing and NATO requiring constant equipment upgrades due to the leapfrogging of technology across the late Cold War, happening constantly in a long arms race. The first demo aircraft flew in the UK, called the British Aerospace EAP (a test aircraft), on the 6th August 1986, to test concepts which would eventually go into the Eurofighter Typhoon (only, in a far more advanced form, after lots of British and multinational collaborative work over the 8 following years after 1986, by the time the Eurofighter Typhoon was introduced in the first tranche/batch in earnest) Where do you think the Eurofighter Typhoon gets it's name from? Eurofighter, yes, referring to the European project to create a formidable fighter fit for the newer geopolitical realities of the 1990's. But where does the Typhoon bit come from? Oh, that's right, the Hawker Typhoon of the RAF (British air force; the Royal Air Force) in WWII. Little remembered fact, there was some German resistance to this naming choice, with the Luftwaffe basically disliking the idea of Typhoon being picked (British Hawker Typhoons and Allied Hawker Typhoons in general had done a lot of damage to German forces in WWII and it was considered unfriendly on some level to name the new multinational fighter after a British attack aircraft from WWII, responsible for absolutely annihilating some tank formations and trains etc) Inversely, the UK was the only partner whom had a problem with the first name Eurofighter, because it sounded too alien to British aircraft naming conventions and generally rather strange as a sort of boring and lazy portmanteau of 'European Fighter'. To the RAF it sounded too generic and dull, as well as potentially politicised. The Eurofighter first name stuck, yes, as the British went along with that, but the rest of the partners agreed to Typhoon as the second name (in spite of German opposition to the use of the name Typhoon, for mid 20th century historical reasons) They were all trying their best to get along and name the aircraft something which made sense in all four languages (British English, German, Italian and Spanish) It wasn't meant to be in Latin or to be overly long, either. Partly for convenience purposes, partly for marketing purposes. The UK RAF began marketing the Eurofighter as the Eurofighter Typhoon before anyone else, with foreign exports outside Europe in mind at that time in the 1990's, which initially didn't sit well with the German Luftwaffe. This slight disagreement didn't last long however, and was quickly moved on from with Germany going along with the name Eurofighter Typhoon like everyone else involved and that little initial confusion over the naming, being largely forgotten now 25 years (more like nearly 30 years) or so later. It doesn't particularly matter now in 2023, though back then there had to be discussions, competitions and arguments made for the idea of which name was went with. Typhoon is alternatively spelt Tifon of Tiffone, in different languages, and different countries involved in producing them or their components, may have differing designations for them. Though the project and end product was definitely named the Eurofighter Typhoon by all, regardless of that. Just as the Panavia Tornado was multinational by a British and German led project, with the Tornado referring to a WWII era British RAF aircraft (the Hawker Tornado), so too would the Eurofighter Typhoon spiritually be named after the Hawker Typhoon. Tornado, Typhoon. And now BAE Systems is developing the Tempest, which, guess what, is named after the Hawker Tempest, from WWII and the early Cold War (first flight 1942, retired in 1953; never saw combat in WWII as it was over before it was ready in numbers) As far as the British were concerned, that was definitely what the Eurofighter Typhoon represented, or part of that legacy at least. A new Typhoon, basically. Ultimately the UK did lead the Eurofighter Typhoon project. In all kinds of ways the UK put more into it's development, for longer, and with more precedent in terms of their own aviation industries. When the UK was leading the push for the "Future European Fighter Aircraft" (FEFA) programme from 1983 onward, as a more serious evolution of their own work going back to 1971, in cooperation with their strongest (and richest) NATO allies in Europe, modern Germany post-1991 (Fall of the Soviet Union, Fall of the Berlin Wall) did not exist yet. When I say 'Germany' was part of the FEFA programme from 1983, what that really means, is that West Germany was. Not a reunified Germany with West Germany and East Germany together, until 1991 onward, of course. And remember, 20 years _before_ 1991, the British had been producing demo test aircraft for concepts for air superiority and multirole aircraft since at least 1971. It should be noted that West Germany was very insistent on a new era fighter of the future for the 1990's, and beyond, and they were to their credit, very actively involved and arguably 2nd only to British input and involvement. Obviously, this ran side by side with the also successful Panavia project which was about to produce the famous Panavia Tornado. In 1983, the British government ordered what was hoped to be a pair of EAP (Experimental Aircraft Programme) aircraft from the work being done in the UK, with overly optimistic intentions of input from Italy and West Germany. This was not forthcoming and so the British aviation engineers working on the project, tested a solitary demo aircraft (instead of the two the government had asked for, lacking contributions at that time from Italy and Germany) This test aircraft used the same RB-199 as used on the Tornado, with the test aircraft being considered by the RAF to be remarkably similar looking to the final product (the Eurofighter Typhoon) The iconic look of the twin-jets on the Eurofighter Typhoon absolutely comes directly from the design legacy of the Tornado and more broadly from UK jet fighter design going back to the 1950's and 1960's. Compare both the Tornado and the Typhoon to the English Electric Lightning, and you'll see what I mean (only with the iconic old English Electric Lightning, a bomber interceptor by type, primarily of the mid Cold War era, the twin-engines are vertically, not horizontally arrayed) The entire 'look' of the Eurofighter is largely based on British designs, both in terms of the aerodynamic models and in terms of the engine layout and design configuration. This entirely British test aircraft was a complete success, following in the footsteps of the earlier design, research and development efforts being made in the UK since 1971. The British House of Commons Accounts Committee, credited this test aircraft with reducing the development of the Eurofighter by a year for a saving of £850 million in 1986 money (so well over £2.3 Billion in today's money) It should also be remembered that a different multinational, European military aviation project, called ACA (Agile Combat Aircraft), had failed by the time the British Aerospace EAP came about. With the failure of the three-nation ACA program, West Germany became convinced that the way ahead was for a _five nation_ multinational project, to come up with the funding and R+D support necessary to sustain and complete it. We should not forget that there were not originally just four members of the Eurofighter Typhoon Project/Programme, but five. France was the other country. Unfortunately, France decided to withdraw from the development of the Eurofighter Typhoon, which was rather controversial and near outrageous at the time, because by then France - privy to a lot of classified information on the EF project - had taken and ran with a lot of it to put into the Dassault Rafale project instead, which was seen as a very sly move by the French and rightly always has been seen that way. It was a pretty unpleasant and deceptive thing to do to allied countries, and it followed in step with the French _also_ withdrawing from the UK led (and ultimately solo UK) project of the Future Carrier Project (which resulted in the two massive British aircraft carriers of the _Queen Elizabeth_-class)

@ThePalaeontologist

Жыл бұрын

France was pretty much determined to follow nationalised military procurement projects in that time, and wanted more of a leading role than the British, which wasn't going to happen because of where so much of the R+D and funding had come from in the first place (the UK) The French, near customarily at this point, were too proud to be part of a project which the British were clearly holding the lion's share of, and wanted to take more jobs from British, German, Italian and Spanish workers, to give unfairly in unjustifiable numbers and proportions, to French workers. While putting one's own country first is important, and I can understand that aspect of the French political decision making from that era, it was still ludicrous for the French to assume more self-importance on the project just because they were France. There was literally zero other justification, other than perhaps making the point that they had and still have a big commercial aviation industry, and that they could support plenty of production themselves. However, for their own prideful reasons, the French withdrew from the project and left with quite a lot of knowledge of what the Eurofighter Typhoon was about. This presented a direct competitor to the Eurofighter Typhoon in overseas sales outside of Europe, and was frankly an unnecessary rival platform which was ill-spirited from the outset. It was literally France stabbing 4 other countries (to whom at least one, the UK, it owed quite a lot, in more ways/wars than one) right in the back. Let's not forget that British ships sunk or heavily damaged in the Falklands War of 1982, were sunk or heavily damaged, by French sold EXOCET missiles in _that_ era. France being two-faced with NATO allies has been a running theme for about 40-50 years at this point, though, if not longer. Again, they had reasons to want to go their own way though that largely involved taking a solid dump on the doorstep of every one of their former partners in the project. It was just rude. And yes, they did benefit heavily directly and/or indirectly from being involved in the project and seeing information and lessons from the largely British demo aircraft. If you have any doubt over which country the Eurofighter Typhoon _truly_ originated in, then please look up the test aircraft called the British Aerospace EAP from 1986. Then look at a typical Eurofighter Typhoon. You'll very quickly see the directly family resemblance. It was no coincidence; in spite of Germany, Italy and Spain contributing in terms of various widgets and gadgets, most of the design elements were British and the British R+D for something like the Eurofighter Typhoon turned out to be, preceded the reunification of Germany by two entire decades. The RAF technically have slightly fewer EF's than Germany, though in reality the British versions in the RAF are much better looked after (there are rife stories of how the German Luftwaffe is underfunded and missing spare parts for their EF's hence why the German government has recently looked into getting a few dozen of the newest EF's from the most recent upgraded tranche. Britain also sent about 32 from Tranche 2 to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia now has 71 in operation since 2018, with the UK selling them a lot of that. Again, I find the comparison to the British Aerospace EAP most compelling. There are various other lines of evidence to support the origin of the EF being in the UK, but there you go. Take a good look at the British Aerospace EAP and it rapidly begins to make sense. Yes, the first flight of the first advanced prototype of the Eurofighter Typhoon was in Bavaria (Southern Germany) though there absolutely was a British precedent before that with the British Aerospace EAP test aircraft from 1986. To me, that is the decisive factor. The UK really has about 100 front-line, actively operable Eurofighter Typhoons now in 2023, in spite of having half as many again and more on paper. The UK is going to eventually only keep the Typhoon FGR4 (the most up to date form) in service well into the 2030's and likely the 2040's (at the utmost limit of it's service in British hands, though others might well use it in modified form even after that) It will secure Eurofighter Typhoon industry related jobs in the UK and Germany until at least the late 2030's. However, BAE Tempest is being developed to outright replace them.

@thenovicegamer007

Жыл бұрын

You say that the only reason France withdrew from the EF program was national pride. But surely the fact that the EF would not have had a carrier capable version (as none of the European countries other than France operates CATOBAR carriers), played a major role in France's decision as well.

@Maddog-xc2zv

Жыл бұрын

@@ThePalaeontologist That's false. The only reason France advanced with the Rafale was because no other country was interested in a carrier based jet and such option would skyrocket the entire project budget, and as at the time only France had a carrier the other countries decided not to go with the carrier based version. So France withdrew and Dassault designed, produced and built the Dassault Rafale both being used on air fields and on the Charles de Gaulle air craft carrier.

@human3213

Жыл бұрын

That's cap. Britain doesn't own any of that. Cope. It's a American jet and eurofighter typhoon is an European jet.

@ThePalaeontologist

Жыл бұрын

@@human3213 Eurofighter is a British led European jet, was my exact point. Look at the British Aerospace EAP and seriously try and pretend the UK wasn't the main designer.

This is a terrible video, full of inaccuracies. The EA-18G is not a fighter, it's an electronic warfare aircraft. The F-35 price (off the rack) is $78 million per (the US has produced over 1,000 F-35's which accounts for their price to continue to drop).

The best Rafale

Load of nonsense .

There's no way a Typhoon is more expensive than an F35. It's madness to buy anything other than F35 for those nations with Typhoons and Rafale.

The SU-57b is as stealthy as a BRICK!! I have seen it, and it is NOT a stealthy aircraft's airframe as it is based on the SU-27 family. The engines' compressors fins and parts show up quite visible to radar { and to the human eye as well! Totally fails in all stealth requirements} and infrared systems that would be protected in any stealth design. It might be agile (it is that) and fast (yes it is), however it fails as a stealth fighter. Sad to say, the best press it has gotten was from "Top Gun : Maverick where it was shot down 3 times. Was that the kind of press you would want for your newest "stealth fighter"? I doubt it.

@marvin902x

Жыл бұрын

So you have all your knowledge from top gun. I am impressed. That means you are pretty much a complete fool.

AHAH Typhoon the bad copy paste of The Rafale that will never come close to it

@ettorefieramosca5460

Жыл бұрын

😂 There is not a single data where the rafale is superior to the Eurofighter. Radar, speed, agility, technology, climb rate and maximum flyover height. The eurofigheter is an air superiority fighter, the rafale a multirole fighter. They have different tasks.

@Zx17OPv57i

Жыл бұрын

@@ettorefieramosca5460 then you can't even search basics on google, that's sad for you .

@darkassassin287

Жыл бұрын

@@Zx17OPv57i people who believe google without any hesitations are idiots

Слышали - штуковина такая, Я никак понять всё не могу, Со всех утюгов, не умолкая, Ей грозят заморскому врагу. К черту мнения Тупых из интернета И пускай В Европу ни ногой, Нет у них Анала и говнета, А у нас есть тот, И есть другой. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. Всё сложней жить в каждодневном бреде И тону среди пиар-атак, Но с помощью его мы в рай поедем, А они - подохнут просто так. К черту мнения Тупых из интернета И пускай В Европу ни ногой, Нет у них Анала и говнета, А у нас есть тот, И есть другой. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. Делаем мы то, что в мире больше В голову другую не полезет, Ни в Германии, ни в США, ни в Польше Не придумали бы ничего полезней. Нам всё объяснили вкратце - Вникнем в суть, чтоб разобраться, С помощью его мы, братцы, Всем дадим еще просраться! У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет.

Russian GARBAGE, makes me laugh!

Su-57 is TOP2 ok wtf this Video, iam hate Russia but SU-57 is The best fighter in Top-2

@izyaslavua2555

Жыл бұрын

Так су-57 це просто макет і не більше

Лживый пропагандистский канал, постоянно превозносится американский металлолом. Я отписываюсь.