3:04 We can't cancel the powers. Cancelling the powers means taking square root, and we always have to take modulus after taking square root

@cyborg029.

2 жыл бұрын

All the best bhaiya ji

@ayushman1940

2 жыл бұрын

@@cyborg029. thanks bhai

@pros.sherwin8194

2 жыл бұрын

no. u can by adding roots on both sides

@pros.sherwin8194

2 жыл бұрын

its basically balancing

@ayushman1940

2 жыл бұрын

@@pros.sherwin8194 what do you mean by adding roots?

Leaving aside the square root step, I like how he uses 1+1 = 2 to get 1+1=3 😂

@sayyedzama3648

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely right

@tashinahmed

2 жыл бұрын

xD

@huszy1461

2 жыл бұрын

Lbird itine born again

@hoshikomiyu8943

2 жыл бұрын

@@sayyedzama3648 yes because he's breaking the rules it makes sense

@MrMcNugget23

2 жыл бұрын

Ikr

For those who are still wondering (1+1=3) why this happened is because In the step where he cancelled the squares on both the sides he did not use the concept of modulus. While taking square root on both sides the value obtained will be inside a mod sign. Ex: we have [√(x)²] will not be equal to x but will be equal to | x |

@jenniferfergerson3949

9 ай бұрын

2+2 is fish

@SNVN.

8 ай бұрын

1+1 is window t@@jenniferfergerson3949

@shekkishyjas3952

8 ай бұрын

😂😂 how in the world is 2+2 fish ?😂

@SNVN.

8 ай бұрын

​@@shekkishyjas39522 + a backwards 2 I think

@binboon749

7 ай бұрын

he is wrong at the fourth step, when he removes the square

In the 1st proof i.e 1+1=3, you should not cancel out the square of a negative number on one side and square of a positive number in another side.3:04 In the 2nd proof i.e 2+2=5, you should not cancel out the expression whose sum adds up to zero(0) in any equation. 6:08

Math developers: Sorry for the inconvenience, we will patch this bug in the next update.

@darkklifesupportukraine6863

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

@username_19388

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao 😭

@Tahazif_TheCool22

2 жыл бұрын

@@username_19388 you cried to death right

@aliciasepulveda4049

2 жыл бұрын

This comment is everything.

@jagmeetgaming8747

2 жыл бұрын

Lol😂

You shouldn't ignore the negative roots. You should put x in √(x²) into a absolute-value and reach a meaningful equation.

@esseandessence4421

2 жыл бұрын

If x^2 = a The x= +a^(1/2) or -a^(1/2) In general there is no problem in neglecting the negative root , but in some cases we discard the positive roots. Actually , it is not a function. F(a) = b , F(a) = c where b =\= c implies F is a Mapping but not a function. Ok

@moto____

2 жыл бұрын

Серьезно!!!

@LORD-px9tv

2 жыл бұрын

@@esseandessence4421 urmom

@LORD-px9tv

2 жыл бұрын

@@esseandessence4421 smart man

@imlisenlkr5863

2 жыл бұрын

@@LORD-px9tv 9

The issue arises at 3:01 because after taking the square root on both sides of the equation, the result needs to be an absolute value. Therefore, the correct step should be |4-5| = |6-5|, meaning 5-4 = 6-5.

@user-xw2oq9dm4r

7 ай бұрын

هنا تم تلاعب و وهمنا بالوصول إلى برهان الصحيح.

@DaUseless1

7 ай бұрын

Plus he forgot the rest of the equation the (2×4x5) and the (2x6x5)

@maliktintilic6886

7 ай бұрын

Bravo!

@dragonyt4046

7 ай бұрын

​​@@DaUseless1no he did not he just use an identity (x+y)² = x²+y² - 2xy

@minhtantran4243

7 ай бұрын

@@dragonyt4046 just fun bro

This is like an advanced Abbot and Costello skit😂

He himself proved, maths rules are universal, hence can't be defied.....

@wuse3300

2 жыл бұрын

Hence proved!!!

@andrei1966

2 жыл бұрын

OH YEA WHAT ABOUT THIS 1+1=11

@artix755

2 жыл бұрын

This is cap because you cant get from 1 to three because there are infinite decimal numbers In between 1 and 3 like 1.1

@puneetmaheshwari7221

2 жыл бұрын

Second step is wrong .........ri8 one should be (16+25)-40 = (36+25)-60 ....Simple rules of mathematics

@PatoChu

2 жыл бұрын

@@artix755 also, go take a pen (1) , go take another pen (1), if you join them, another pen wont just randomly appear…

It doesn't. Your formula is broken because you have two different values for x. On arrow line 3 you have x=4 y=5 on left side, then x=6 y=5 on right hand. The 6 should be a "z" "a" etc. so in principle your formula becomes (x-y)2-2xy=(z-y)2-2zy. So here you are considering "1" as a variable value, so then of course it could be equal to 3. But this logic you have shown above does not break the rules of mathematics.

@apollo_kingg

2 жыл бұрын

Bro x can have two different values in nature

@Zextranet

2 жыл бұрын

He likes Math and Physics, Math and Physics doesn't like him

@beastslayergaming470

2 жыл бұрын

@@hockeyworld818 read it again😁

@ishansaini8043

2 жыл бұрын

You fool we can take rhs as x and y and lhs as a and b than no problem

@marksman1324

2 жыл бұрын

in which class do u read ? xD even though if it was different values , you can see (4-5)=(6-5) and square on each of them .... after solution we will get -1 square=1 square which is again equal to the starting (1=1)

the step where the squares are removed is where you take the square root of both sides, but the square root of a value has two possible values (one positive, and one negative). when the signs are taken into account you resolve the issues. In the second calculation your cancellation step involves dividing by the value within the brackets (4-3-1), however given 4-3-1 is zero you are dividing both side by zero. The problem is dividing any integer by zero gives the result of infinity (so the correct result would be infinity = infinity).

In the first case, 1+1 = 3, you reached the following equation: There you removed the parenthesis power from both sides. while on the right side you can write (4-5) or (5-4) which means 4-5=-1 or 5-4=1 and on the left side you can write 5-6=-1 or Write 6-5=1. In other words, the square root of both sides has two answers: 1 and -1. You deliberately ignored the -1 from the left side and set it equal to 1 on the right. This is where the path to the wrong conclusion begins.

@dr.busingye

7 ай бұрын

Yes, the fact that (-1)^2=(1)^2 does not mean that -1=1. Also it is true root of G^2 is both -G and G!

@yurchenko_vadim

7 ай бұрын

Це відео для тих хто погано вчився у школі.

@NotJayXD

7 ай бұрын

LOL 5 minutes ago@@yurchenko_vadim

@georgesmith2667

7 ай бұрын

Sorry, I can't read Russia@@yurchenko_vadim

@yurchenko_vadim

7 ай бұрын

@@georgesmith2667 it is not Russian, but Ukrainian. When I was reading the comments, there was an opportunity to automatically translate comments written in English or some other language into Ukrainian, so I wrote a comment thinking that you would also press the button and translate it into your language. And I wrote in the previous comment that this video is for those who did not study well at school.

In second calculation. 4(4-3-1)=5(4-3-1) We can not cancel (4-3-1) from both sides, becoz the value of the term is zero and "0÷0" *is not defined* not "1" . For better understanding 0=0 3×0=4×0 If we zero from both sides Then 3=4 So thats why we cant say 0÷0 is 1 Its just not defined.

@pranilkv810

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely nonsense... Wrong calculations...

This is what happens when you miss the basics of mathematics and think yourself as mathematical genius 🤣

@vipgamingyt849

2 жыл бұрын

Yes lol😂😼

@indrashisgangopadhyay74

2 жыл бұрын

Bro he's making it just for fun

@hasibulislamshanto143

2 жыл бұрын

But he seems serious.

@yd2487

2 жыл бұрын

@@hasibulislamshanto143 ya he serius He seriusly making a joke

@irmasuraya7409

2 жыл бұрын

When A "Mathematics Genius" Wanna Take A Challenge

teacher : "the test isn't that hard" the test:

I have gud proof: 1 dad + 1 mom = 1 child = 3 people

@michaelmoorer1523

2 ай бұрын

1 dad plus 1 mom pregnant with twins = 2 children=4 people 🧐🧐🧐

@samuelblossey4600

2 ай бұрын

@@michaelmoorer1523 we ignore that

@kellymckenzie4865

Ай бұрын

That's 1+1+1.

@AkileSwatch

Ай бұрын

But if they stay united could that still be 1?

Legends are shock after seeing this calculation 😱 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You are going against basic BODMAS (Brackets, Order, Division, Multiplication, Addition, Subtraction) rule or PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction) rule that is why you are getting the wrong result. In your first 2 examples brackets should be solved first.

@theenjoyfullshorts188

2 жыл бұрын

He wrote in the tiltle breaking the rules of maths

@ray-rx7zy

2 жыл бұрын

@@theenjoyfullshorts188 at 4:22 he asked anyone to comment where he had made an error

@audio4642

2 жыл бұрын

Bodmas is brackets order division multiplication addition subtraction

@syedfaizanarshad1945

2 жыл бұрын

@@audio4642 yes right thanks, I have updated. I think my point makes sense

@dagimuser8923

Жыл бұрын

in my point of view its good to say proof 2≠3 instead of you said 1+1=3 you have to showed that 2≠3

If you're a budding mathematician, this video is absolutely correct in what it is trying to demonstrate. Authors of comments offering destructive or instructive criticism may have failed to read the video description 😂

About 2 + 2 = 5 The (4 - 3 - 1) = 0 => We cannot divide both sides of an equality by zero. This is one of the states of ambiguity. First we need to clear this ambiguity and then divide. When you have 4(4 - 3 - 1) = 5(4 - 3 - 1) => clear (4 - 3 - 1) from both sides of the equation, means, you divided 4(4 - 3 - 1) /(4 - 3 - 1) = 5(4 - 3 - 1)/(4 - 3 - 1) => (4 x 0)/0 = (5 x 0)/0 Zero when divided by zero in the denominator means ambiguity

6:24 I apologize if my previous responses were unclear. You are absolutely correct. Dividing by zero is undefined in mathematics, and that's where the error in your original manipulation occurs. When you divided both sides by (4-3-1), you were effectively dividing by zero, which is not a valid operation. This is why the conclusion that 4 = 5 is incorrect. Thank you for clarifying, and I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous responses. If you have more questions or need further assistance, please feel free to ask.

@balck_

7 ай бұрын

Bro copied from chatgpt 💀

@alibinnaseer

7 ай бұрын

@@balck_ 💀💀

@ferrel9715

6 ай бұрын

​@@balck_💀

@Shibu-069

6 ай бұрын

bro really thought we wouldn’t notice the essence of chat gpt here 😂

You can't cancel the squares, it's just for our convenience. The importance of brackets is the base of mathematics. I did the same mistake, but in another equation in class 8th, then after wondering for hours, I found out that this is the wrong way.

@neBen_

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly what I'm saying, you CANNOT cancel the squares.

@pratyushprayashjena5599

2 жыл бұрын

Ya same with me

@divinegaming704

2 жыл бұрын

breaking the rules with wrong methods,first learn every concept of maths then come to make it wrong, okk my son

@RainzOn270Hz

2 жыл бұрын

*When a 6th grader watches this be like*

@divinegaming704

2 жыл бұрын

@@RainzOn270Hz he will amazed how this happened

The step right after taking the square roots on both sides ... 4 - 5 = 6 - 5 means - 1 = + 1 This was where the rules of arithmetic broke down, at 3:10 And at 6:01 the expression in brackets (4 - 3 - 1) evaluates to 0. Cancelling (4 - 3 - 1) on both sides is the same as dividing by 0 on both sides. Division by 0 is not allowed by the rules of arithmetic.

Imagine trying to teach a child what 1+1 is if you're this guy

3:12; he just canceled the squares so if we just solve what's inside the bracket we get (-1)^2 = (1)^2 which is true since the square of a negative number is positive but after canceling the squares he wrote -1 = 1 which is not true and if we take the square root of (-1)^2 we get 1 so the correct thing after 3:12 would be 1 = 1 which is true

@yuktarthprakashtailor7057

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@sudiptadas7670

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. His whole point is depending on this very wrong deduction. And he just ignored the most important part of square root.

@giacomoradicchi

2 жыл бұрын

he should have put the absolute value

@prajwalkumar4366

2 жыл бұрын

Yes you are right you can't cancel power like that

@thesnakehuntervenom1363

2 жыл бұрын

Damn! It's very true!

2:42 can also be as (5-4)^2 If you remove the squares +- term is used so that the product varies Taking positive and negative term differently gives you different answers out of them you get (1, something else)you can't directly consider it as true

@hoanglong3754

2 жыл бұрын

he didn't divide numbers that have the same value, that's it

@ahmadrahman6252

2 жыл бұрын

OMG..🤯

@hatimwarrior

2 жыл бұрын

This is already a silly proof , anyone can do this , ahhh

@ahmadrahman6252

2 жыл бұрын

@@hatimwarrior Then why didn't you comment before him..? 🥴

@gourinayak4901

2 жыл бұрын

Your answer is comment is best of all

when you remove the squares from both sides, you must make sure that each side is a positive root or each is negative.

(a-b)^2 = (b-a)^2 whereas (a-b) is not equal to (b-a); so you proved in a wrong way.

@anawrassey1514

22 күн бұрын

Nice...m

I can hear Sheldon Cooper's condescending laugh😂😂

(4-5)^2 = (6-5)^2 Does not imply: 4-5 = 6-5 rather what it does imply is that: |(4-5)| = |(6-5)| => |-1| = |1| => 1 = 1 So 1 + 1 = 2 is the only possible outcome and 1 + 1 = 3 is not possible.

@hafizurrahman7441

2 жыл бұрын

Thx a lot bro

@teamverity191

2 жыл бұрын

Ok i am 9 and i do yr 7 work and ppl like u saying dis stuff me: boi what did u just say

@killy-yz9mt

2 жыл бұрын

yeap.but was a good clickbait😂watched the hole vid

@pika9629

2 жыл бұрын

@@teamverity191 im 9,9 im almost 10

@ceelyacruz

2 ай бұрын

Not “0”? 😂

When cancelling the square, you should use (+ or -) in the first sum. In the seciond sum you cancel (4-3-1). Here you must understand that this cancellation means you are dividing both sides by (4-3-1). It means you are dividing both sides by zero. So the resul is "infinity =infinity", and not " 4=5".

@Fifasher2K

7 ай бұрын

And -1≠1

6:25 In the second proof (2+2=5) in the third step when you took 4 from a side and 5 from another, in the remaining brackets the sum of numbers were equal to 0 and therefore: 4(0)=5(0)=0 And 0s can’t cancel out due to mathematical logic (unidentified)

(4-5)²=(6-5)² RHS=√(6-5)²=+(6-5) or -(6-5) Only one value can be correct which is -(6-5) Same case in LHS If LHS is (4-5) RHS must be -(6-5)

@demotaekwondorjagg2645

2 жыл бұрын

Whaaaa

@venkateswarluvemuri7395

2 жыл бұрын

Say whaaaaaaaa

@laelaelu

2 жыл бұрын

I had a stroke reading that

@gorlajyothi4452

2 жыл бұрын

Witch spelling is wrong Correct spelling is WHICH

@geeksahid3698

2 жыл бұрын

@@gorlajyothi4452 thanks

when you took square root both sides, they should open with both plus minus sign. Because as we know that both 2 and -2 have same square i.e 4.

2:35 begins the failure. Xs and Ys in both sides aren't the same in value, so they're not giving the right equation.

We use the x and y in equations to try and find out an unknown number 4 is a known number hence why we can't get the 5 to the other side as positive 5

Exponents don't cancel. You would have to take the square root of each side, which then makes each side ±. If you want to simplify it you could take the absolute value of each side: |4-5|=|6-5| => |-1|=|1| => 1=1

@kartiksharma69

Жыл бұрын

true

@originalni_popisovac

Жыл бұрын

L anime use normal pfps

@guillaumenoel1550

4 ай бұрын

a²=b²=>a=b is false then next step he wrote -1 = 1 hahaha

When you remove the squares, you have to calculate the absolute value of the sub-radical number

@cocacolaengordei6923

2 жыл бұрын

o que isso afeta o grêmio?

@notnero5280

2 жыл бұрын

Dunno what you just said but I agree.

Apart form what my fellow mathematics professors have pointed out as error, I saw it fitting to add that this guy is grossly wrong by considering that 2=3 and or 4=5 : at this point it's a mathematical contradiction. Two distinct objects say a, b will be equal to three distinct objects say a, b, c .. ie a,b != a, b, c

когда мы вычисляем корень из х², то х надо писать под модулем |x|. таким образом 5 строка будет выглядеть как |4 - 5| = |6 - 5| => |-1| = |1| => 1 = 1. это правило надо помнить, чтобы не возникало таких "странных" уравнений))

"BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNMENT-" I can never not think about this while watching this video

@mariorobles7924

2 жыл бұрын

1996 omar

@demetregelenava4740

2 жыл бұрын

Chill bro 1+1 is not 3 he did wrong way the he made left side other way and right side other way left was (5-4)**2 he did just wrong way

@demetregelenava4740

2 жыл бұрын

And **2 can't be minus so (4-5)**2 is not number

@raghav2496

2 жыл бұрын

@@mariorobles7924 why

@iliasilias2108

2 жыл бұрын

@@raghav2496 iLiAS iLiAS F0RTNlTE adonnés KZread 😀🤣🤣🤣

When dealing with an equation with no variables,you cannot shift stuff from left hand side to right hand side and vice versa.

@zaero2379

2 жыл бұрын

you can 5 + 4 = 10 - 1 is the same as 5 = 10 - 1 - 4

That is the strongest and the most uncomprehendable accent i've ever heard

Don't just cancel the power here, do square root instead :- (4 - 5)² = (6 - 5)² Or, √-1² = √1² Here in basic mathematics, we can't find square root of -1. So you can't prove 1 + 1 = 3.

According to step 2, root of something is always "+" or "-" we cannot just cancel the squares like that. And also we can write (a-b)^2 as (b-a)^2. If you solve the problem by putting (b-a)^2 then you'll get 1+1 = 2 as the answer... and in the title you have written "breaking the rules of mathematics" so, for this video, it's okay

@kking3875

Жыл бұрын

I definetly understand u 😢

@godofyeetmasochism6534

Жыл бұрын

My head hurts listening to his voice as well as his misleading math

@samuelelliotsuhofker6334

Жыл бұрын

Ok

@ssomchit1

Жыл бұрын

I realize that things gone wrong because of eliminating power 2 ,but i don't khow what the reason,your explanation make me clear. can you know the reason why 2+2=5 in the second solving.

@playersap4821

Жыл бұрын

Exactly... I had the same catch of mistake... "+Or-" in either side is cumpolsary

In the second case,since 4-3-1=0 we can not cancel it out from both sides of an equation, as dividing by zero is not allowed.

You don't cancel the square of both sides like addition or subtraction.. Cause square element always has two values..

This is like a layer finding a legal loophole where it doesn't exist

Math teachers are afraid of this guy

@user-sg5jx4rs3k

Жыл бұрын

Ahhahq

There were two roots when you eliminated the square .there you can shift one square to other side and then use a²-b²=(a-b)(a+b) where a-b is actually a imaginary root in this case while a+b is a perfect root which satisfies the rules of mathematics and makes us feel what we studies was not wrong. Read it fully if you want to know the truth

@Deaddeyess

2 жыл бұрын

My man, u got the first Let me tell u about 2nd He took 0=0 But in actuality 0/0 = it can be infinity and also it can be any number

@yaswanthbaddireddy2420

2 жыл бұрын

Bro some people think it is true 🤣 from where he cancle the roots from both sides.

@laytondavis5070

2 жыл бұрын

😐

@pitchblack_the_first

2 жыл бұрын

Nerd lol

@kabeeralishaikh1439

Жыл бұрын

@@Deaddeyess another fact is that 0/oo =0 (oo = infinity)

3:04 A new Ramanujam is born. Cancelling powers and leaving our the products. 😂😂😂😂😂

Let's go through the series of mathematical operations step by step to identify the errors: 1. The initial statement "1 + 1 = 3" is boxed at the top as the proposition being proven. 2. They start with a true statement "1 = 1" to begin the manipulation. 3. The following step, "41 - 40 = 61 - 60," is correct as both sides equal 1. 4. They then proceed to "16 + 25 - 40 = 36 + 25 - 60." This step is valid because 16 + 25 = 41 and 36 + 25 = 61, with both sides subtracting the same amount, resulting in 1 = 1. 5. The next line, "4^2 + 5^2 - 2*4.5 = 6^2 + 5^2 - 2*6.5," is also correct. Here they're expanding the squared terms (4^2 and 6^2) and including the middle term of the binomial expansion which would indeed cancel out to give 1 = 1 if the terms were correct. 6. But the operation that follows, "(4 - 5)^2 = (6 - 5)^2," is incorrect. They've incorrectly simplified the previous step. What should have happened here is that the left side would be 4^2 - 2*4*5 + 5^2 and the right side would be 6^2 - 2*6*5 + 5^2, and you cannot just cancel out the middle terms independently since they are not like terms. 7. Proceeding from the false equivalence "(4 - 5)^2 = (6 - 5)^2," they correctly calculate that (4 - 5)^2 = (-1)^2 = 1 and (6 - 5)^2 = 1^2 = 1. However, this is based on the previous incorrect simplification. 8. The next line "4 - 5 = 6 - 5" incorrectly assumes that if two squares are equal, then their roots must be equal, without considering that squaring is not a one-to-one function. Squaring eliminates negative signs, so while the squares may be equal, the original numbers may have been negatives of each other. 9. They then incorrectly cancel out the "-5" from both sides, which is not valid algebraic manipulation. 10. From there, they reach "4 = 6," which is obviously incorrect, but then they add "+5" to both sides, maintaining the incorrect equality. 11. Dividing by 2 on both sides, they get "2 = 3," which is a continuation of the error. 12. They conclude with "1 + 1 = 3," circled at the bottom, based on the erroneous steps above. The most glaring mathematical error is the step from (4 - 5)^2 to 4 - 5, assuming that because the squares are equal, the bases must be equal as well. This overlooks the fact that both positive and negative numbers yield the same square, so this does not hold when removing the square. The subsequent steps are based on this incorrect simplification, leading to the incorrect conclusion.

But 4-50 So you cant delete the square because you can delete it only when the 2 values smaller ,equale 0 or when the 2values are bigger ,equale 0 Sorry for my rip english 😅

@manow_ch7918

2 жыл бұрын

No. You can remove square but they gonna have absolute symbols “ | | “ (4-5)^2 -> |(4-5)| (6-5)^2 -> |(6-5)| Then you have |(4-5)| = |(6-5)| |-1| = |1| then 1=1.

@user-sl8wz4kf8l

2 жыл бұрын

yeh so there's the problem

@shadowfalakito6261

2 жыл бұрын

√a with a

@zdwlf3934

2 жыл бұрын

@@manow_ch7918 respect bro

@maxmax1518

2 жыл бұрын

1+1=3 In the 4th line you skipped half the action and since then it can not stand there a sign equals 2+2=5 Cannot be divided by 0 4-3-1=0 By shortening we divide both sides by 0 11 is magic 😁 Sorry for the tragic English

When removing the squares u have to put +-. For ex: ( (-1)^2 = (1)^2 ) this equation is correct, now if you remove the square u can't say -1 = 1 . But say | -1 | = | 1 | so that the negative is removed so 1 = 1 ... Now for (4-5)^2 = (6-5)^2 it's the same concept. Removing the squares: |4-5| = |6-5| To simplify it further: | -1 | = | 1 |, which is just 1=1

@GjigantiChannel

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t know who u are, what u are and where u are but i will find u and i will get u a job to Nasa

@vkdevil5624

Жыл бұрын

@@GjigantiChannel 🤣🤣

5:37 bro is the mathematics equivalent of Glenn Beck 🤣

i knew bro cooked, when he said, "they cancel each other"

3:05 if u want to get rid of powers u need to put sqrt on both sides which will result in the left 1 (4-5) that is -1 to transform into 1 cuz of ABS.

@Marlow998

Жыл бұрын

@@takshilsharma4036 Nah there's no minus nember inside the root ( rules )

In first part, if x²=y² Doesn't mean x is always equals to y so you can't simply cancel power, They will only be equal if x and y both are positive or both negative. In second part what you did was dividing 0/0 which is also not defined. because 4-3-1 = 0. You can't cancel 0 from both sides that way.

@AshokKumar-rx2vw

Жыл бұрын

You are bhuskhonda aadmi

@bellaworku619

11 ай бұрын

108

@passykirabo

10 ай бұрын

If powers are the same then it's correct

@FluxFrames

10 ай бұрын

​@@passykiraboIf you're talking about the first part, then if you look carefully in 5th line he wrote ⇛(4 - 5)² = (6 - 5)² which can also be written as ⇛ (-1)² = (1)² Until this line it was correct as square of -1 is equal to square of 1 but due to this you can't say -1 = 1 and that's what he did he actually equated (-1 = 1) but wrote it in different way like this: 4 - 5 = 6 - 5 And people might have believed it true (not everyone). Hope you understand my complicated explanation😅 I tried my best to explain.

Who knew a simple math equation could be so confusing?

Dude learned math from TikTok

In the first case you must use absolute value, in the second one you can't divide by 0

@diponkabir4005

2 жыл бұрын

Tui faul player

@TuanLe-mq5nx

2 жыл бұрын

Its his proof, i knew you cant divide by 0 but thats his proof

Truly breaking mathematics rule, by cancelling the Powers 😀👍

You can't simply choose to cancel powers without affecting the rest of the equation.

it is impossible to abbreviate the second degrees, as it is expressions (A - В) (A - В) = (С - D) (C - D), but A - B not equal С - D, so, abbreviating is impossible.

(4-5)²=(6-5)² That means : (4-5)×(4-5) = (6-5)×(6-5) so you can't remove the square because (4-5)≠(6-5)

@yogeswaran.m

2 жыл бұрын

Bro both square can be remove

@beastprantik9691

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know but... If you have 1 paper and another person give you 1 more paper then will it be 3 paper?

@7ammasfiyoutube872

2 жыл бұрын

@@yogeswaran.m if you want to remove the square you must take the square root of both sides so : (4-5)² = (6-5)² ✓(4-5)² = ✓(6-5)² | 4-5 | = | 6-5 | 5-4 = 6-5 1=1 ✓✓✓

@khanokakhazana6244

2 жыл бұрын

Bro there is one another property if power are equal then we write only base. A^3=B^3 or (any other Higher power) A=B

@AMRESHKUMAR-up4vd

2 жыл бұрын

Mahanubhav (4-5)^2 nahi (5-4)^2 hoga ye aapne mistake kiya. Aapko gyat hona chahiye when we prove irrationality of √2 Or other irrational no. We do it by an argument and general observation. In Mathematics Or while proposing any theory it is checked that it should explain general observation and not that it is contradictory to common result. For e.g. While calculating time in kinematics sometimes we get. t^2=4 Hence t=+2 and -2. We know that -2 has no significance in time calculation we just neglect that result

(a-b)^2 = (c-d)^2 doesnt mean a-b = c-d you forgot the case that a-b or c-d is a minus number which multiply by itself still equals the opposite of the number multiply by that one too

I wouldn't say that these are your own errors, but any multiplication or division of the dependent or independent variable leads to errors (that is, C- increases when simplifying). My graduate thesis from 1986 "Numerical Analysis-Gradient Method" deals with this topic in a much more complex way, and additionally has as a topic "gravity" and AI on modern computers. Unfortunately, what I pointed out is not accepted in science, because it would revolutionize physics. The physics institution, that is, one man, completely rejected me as a possible collaborator(ie. or as an employee).

Mathematics is confused in itself 😂😂😂

Teacher:what is 1+1=? Me:hard question, its 3. Teacher:Huh, what are you talking about? Prove it its 3. Me:

2:21 "eeks! mynus why? Holy sqare."

If the exponent of a power is even and the base is not negative, when you take the root, the result comes out within the absolute value.

If you can prove 1 + 1 = 3 and given that 1 + 1 = 2, then 2 = 3. Take a look at this: If x^x^x^x^x... = 2 x^(x^x^x^x...) = 2 x^2 = w x = √2 And this as well: If x^x^x^x^x... = 4 x^(x^x^x^x...) = 4 x^4 = 4 x = √2 Since (√2)^(√2)^√2)^... = 2 or 4 2 = 4. This is similar to what you did. You're literally cancelling the powers without considering the other roots.

I clicked on this thinking this is a joke 💀

When your teacher testing you what is 1 + 1 is... Me: 3 Teacher: why Me: *struggling to explain*

The “error” is saying you can just cancel the “squares”. Basically he could have said from the start (-1)^2 = 1 = (1)^2. If you then cancel the “squares” you have -1 = 1, which obviously isn’t right! Basically in the formula it doesn’t distinguish whether it is y or x that is negative so he chose in a way that he could the cancel the squares leaving the incorrect paradox

Step 6: you canceled out -5 + 5 for 0 leaving 4 = 6, assuming that its 4 = 6 - (5+5), when in reality bedmas states that division & multiplication (we'll call this DM) and addition & subtraction (well call this AS) are not in that exact order but DM are equal to eachother, aswell as AS basically meaning that if either are in a calculation, it is does left to right in regards to said functions. e.g. 6 - 5 + 5 does NOT equal 4, but 6. so you cant cancel -5 + 5.

When you cancel the squares both positive and negative value needs to be taken, there is not any contradiction in this, you just need to do it correctly

@antonioaldrich8067

2 жыл бұрын

Yep exactly

@techfacts367

2 жыл бұрын

2

When you remove the squared exponent, you must have absolute values ​​on both sides

Woman: How many balls do you have? Man: 1+1=3

@kogamingmm.da2196

6 ай бұрын

😂😂

O erro começou na quarta linha, onde você impôs que (1)^2=(-1)^2. A partir daí o erro só continua...

2:45 use equation correctly

In 2+2=5,4th line (4-3-1) can't be cancelled by (4-3-1) because of their value ❤️👍

@rigeln1101

2 жыл бұрын

I think you can its like you divide both side by (4-3-1)

@naratipprakobsrikul1587

2 жыл бұрын

@@rigeln1101 you can't divide by 0. Right?

Flat Earthers: I Have Proof The Earth Is Flat! Their Proof:

At 3:52 , he only agrees that 2 is 1+1 😂

When 2nd question ur don't follow rules at 4 th step. (4-3-1=0 & 4-3-1=0) so zero divide by zero that value going to be infinity ..so we can't divide that case

And I thought the American education system was bad…

This advance math algorithm was invented by the youtuber during his first night with his gf to prove 0"=6". She had to agree in grief.

Someone should report this abuse of the square root.

U can't just eliminate those squares, because elimination of squares means you're applying a root on the numbers, but, as we know in mathematics, you can't apply the root on negative numbers, as you did with (4-5)... You'll have to use absolute symbols, but you'll end up returning to 1=1

@theterminator9393

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah u r right,, also, 1=1 √1= √1 -1 = 1 (√1= 1, -1) This is how this math creates the problem🤣

@hichampiggy9795

2 жыл бұрын

@@theterminator9393 but it's more correct to right √1^2= 1 *OR* √1^2= -1

@arvinrodrigues1177

2 жыл бұрын

i might be wrong but u actually can.... lets say a square= b square we can say a and b are equal because they have the same square and similarly lets say (a-b)whole square = (c-b) whole square we can say by looking at this that (a-b)= (c-b)because if we take the square of one side to the other, it becomes square root. this proves a and c are the same number when they arent.... and might just be the negative version of the same number. i think he isnt actually wrong... he has made the entire equation quadratic which is why there are 2 values on the lhs and rhs. one is 1+1 = 3 and the other is 1+1 = 0. idk what absolute symbols are but what he has done is definitely not wrong even though the root of -1 is an imaginary number if we take it in the form of variables we get this as the answer. he doesnt break any rule of mathematics but you are not supposed to make an equation quadratic if its possible to solve it like this. we could use the same logic and make it a cubic equation which will give 3 values for 1+1

@shirandabare

Жыл бұрын

square root of a negative number is possible in the COMPLEX NUMBER SYSTEM. The notation "i" is used.

If I write this 1+1=3 in my exam ,my teacher kick me out from the exam hall, I know sir your mathematics 1+1=3 is also correct, but for small students 1+1=2 only😢😢😢

@MukeshKumar-og4hk

2 жыл бұрын

For me it's true, sis😢😢

@parvejain23.

2 жыл бұрын

Ap kite years k ho?

@Sultanacooking737

2 жыл бұрын

True ;-;

@Kamal55984

2 жыл бұрын

@@btsblkpik5650 Hlo I am also Blink and Army💜 Do you like Kdrama??

@btsblkpik5650

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kamal55984 not much but yah I like little bit😊😊

When 1=1 is considered, then ONLY equal quantity can be added or subtracted on both sides. It is nothing but just a musical trick to those who are ignorant of basic rules of Arthmetics.

by dropping 2.4.2 on the left and 2.6.5 on the right, you demonstrated mathematical deficiency

Squares can't be cancelled if the Integers are known, they should be solved out after that we can cancel i.e, (-1)² = (1)² = 1 . It can be applied only and only if the values(a,b) are unknown.

@trazzy9741

2 жыл бұрын

They can it doesn't matter

@antoniomontiel5610

2 жыл бұрын

1+1=3?no

@kamalakannanr801

2 жыл бұрын

Also if (a,b) are known.... We can't cancel the squares..... We should take ±. Then it will obey mathematics.....

Interesting! Even tho you've made a mistake on purpose, it still kinda makes us rethink maths😁

So, the only mistake I found in the calculation is that *Humans love to make things complicated*

Looks like I am watching another episode of Abbot and Costello

2 main rules were broken, but still amazing! X should only have 1 value, and step 6 uses the distributive property wrong (for the 1 + 1 = 3 eqasion)

@k2born574

2 жыл бұрын

Poda lose 😝😝😝😝😝

@kunnamkulambeluga5231

2 жыл бұрын

@@k2born574malayali 👀😜

@theboldguy.

2 жыл бұрын

a lot more than 2

This is not the only case where such things happen in mathematics. While solving equations (especially in more than 50% problems of trigonometric equations), most of the people break rules in steps involved. For example if one writes cosθ = 1/secθ, he/she must take care that θ should not be odd integral multiple of π/2 (or simply θ is not 90° for beginners).

@thuyngatran5470

Жыл бұрын

chi

@aaryateja4530

Жыл бұрын

θ can be 90° because Cos 90°=0, while 1/Sec 90° or 1/infinity is also equal to zero. How?

Sí eliminas el cuadrado, están diciendo que 1 es igual a -1 😂

In the second calculation he cant cancel 4-3-1 on both sides because it means he is dividing 0 on both sides and division by zero is undefined.